Kinetic Energy: T or K in Mechanics/QM?

AI Thread Summary
In classical mechanics, kinetic energy is typically represented by the symbol T, while in quantum mechanics (QM), it can be denoted as either T or K. The reasons behind the different notations remain unclear and are described as shrouded in mystery. There are hints of a deeper historical context, suggesting that the choice of symbols may be linked to ancient traditions. The discussion alludes to a secretive aspect of this notation, implying that significant efforts have been made to protect this knowledge. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the ongoing intrigue surrounding the symbols used for kinetic energy in both classical and quantum mechanics.
pivoxa15
Messages
2,250
Reaction score
1
In classical mechanics, the kinetic energy is denoted T. Why not K? In QM the kinetic energy operator is sometimes denoted by T as well although I have seen it denoted as K.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shrouded in mystery, forgotten lore irretrievable from the hoary, ancient past..
 
We can't tell you that information yet, but we can reveal that thousands have died protecting the secret.
 
Yet some of the struggling survivors are still spilling their blood in order to keep the secret unrevealed and safe to a world which is still unprepared to face the eyes of the truth.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'

Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'

Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
View full post »

Thread 'Do electron density waves accompany EM waves in coaxial cables?'

Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
View full post »
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'

Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'

The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
View full post »

Similar threads

I How to calculate the kinetic energy of an object propelled by a magnet?
Replies
15
Views
1K
B Work Done By Conservative Forces
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Relationship between Concentration of a Force and Energy Density
Replies
11
Views
1K
I Intuitive look at bending of light by gravity
Replies
25
Views
969
B The relationship between mc^2 and mc^2 x 1/2
Replies
16
Views
1K
I Is Mechanical Energy Conservation Free of Ambiguity - follow up
2
Replies
77
Views
4K
I Deriving formula for kinetic energy
Replies
3
Views
1K
B Ignoring the motion of the Earth for energy vs. momentum conservation
Replies
21
Views
2K
I Lagrangian for pendulum
Replies
11
Views
2K
B Conceptually understanding change in potential energy with 0 net work
Replies
9
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top