Proving that MN is Parallel to AB and CD

  • Thread starter Thread starter Styx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parallel
AI Thread Summary
Lines AB and CD are established as parallel, with M and N as midpoints of segments AD and BC, respectively. The proof involves drawing perpendicular lines from points A and B to line CD, demonstrating that these lines are equal in length due to the properties of parallel lines. By marking midpoints Q and R on these perpendiculars, it is shown that line segment MN, connecting points M and N, is parallel to both AB and CD. The discussion highlights the complexity of the proof and the need for clarity in what can be assumed versus what needs to be proven. Ultimately, the conclusion is that MN is indeed parallel to AB and CD.
Styx
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Lines AB and CD are parallel. You are given M and N as midpoints of AD and BC, respectively.

Prove that MN is parallel to AB and CD


Ok, so I think I way (WAY) over complicated this. Can someone please suggest a shorter route to my answer? The worst part is that even after working out this own mess below I think my proof is half baked at best...

:eek: Work:eek:

Draw a perpendicular line from the midpoint of AB to line CD.
Draw a perpendicular line from the midpoint of CD to line AB.
The two lines overlap
Therefore, angles AQP, BQP, DPQ, CPQ are 90 degrees.

point Q is what I gave the midpoint of AB, P is the midpoint of DP and Point O is where AC and DB intercept

Draw a line from point B to point D, and from point A to Point C.
Consider triangles AQO and BQO
AQ = BQ since Q is at the midpoint between AB
angle AQO and angle BQO are both right angles
QO = QO (common to both triangles)
Therefore, triangles AQO and BQO are congruent as per the SAS condition of the triangle congruence theorm.

The same consideration can be applied to DPO and CPO to show that they are congruent as per the SAS condition of a triangle.

180 degrees - angle AOB = angle DOA
180 degrees - angle AOB = angle COB
Therefore, angle DOA = angle COB

AO = BO, DO = CO
Therfore, Triangles COB and DOA are congruent as per the SAS condition of a triangle.

AD = BC, AM = MD, BN = NC
Therefore, AM = MD = BN = NC

MN can only meet this conditions if it is a parallel line.
Therefore, MN is parallel to AB and DC

I am kind of unclear as to what I have to prove and what I can take for granted when I am working on these so I attempt to prove everything under the sun.
 

Attachments

  • graph.jpg
    graph.jpg
    6.2 KB · Views: 418
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, I just used Geometer's Sketchpad (great program btw) which disproved my first assumption that angles AQP, BQP, DPQ, CPQ are 90 degrees.

So, I guess I will start over...

Part B) States: Prove that MN =(1/2)(AB+CD) which I know is true as per Sketch pad. Can I use that in solving part a) or is that considered bad form?

The only thing I know for sure (other that what was given is that angle ABD = angle BDC, angle BAC = angle ACD
 
Last edited:
I rewrote my proof as:

AB and CD are parallel and M and N are the midpoints of AD and BC (given hypothesis).

Draw a perpendicular line from point B to line DC.
Draw a perpendicular line from point A to line DC.
Label them points O and P.
Since AO and BP are both perpendicular lines between the same two parallel lines AO = BP

Mark the midpoint of AO and BP, label them Q and R
Both points Q and R fall on line MN
Therefore, MN is parallel to AB and CD
 
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Since ##px^9+q## is the factor, then ##x^9=\frac{-q}{p}## will be one of the roots. Let ##f(x)=27x^{18}+bx^9+70##, then: $$27\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)^2+b\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)+70=0$$ $$b=27 \frac{q}{p}+70 \frac{p}{q}$$ $$b=\frac{27q^2+70p^2}{pq}$$ From this expression, it looks like there is no greatest value of ##b## because increasing the value of ##p## and ##q## will also increase the value of ##b##. How to find the greatest value of ##b##? Thanks
Back
Top