Why is U-235 fissionable by thermal neutrons but U-238 not

  • Thread starter Thread starter saleem
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Neutrons Thermal
saleem
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have this question

Why U-235 is fissionable by thermal neutrons whereas U-238
requires E>1.4MeV
Thank you:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
235 is fissle as it's activation energy/fissile barrier, the energy required to cause irreversible deformation of the nucleus is very low.

If you look at the semi empirical mass formula the coulomb and surface area terms reduce and increase respectivly (like a harmonic oscillator) when a neutron is absorbed by the nucleus. If the energy is great enough the coulomb term dominates and causes an irreversible deformation which leads to break up of the nucleus.

the activation energy is the energy required to do this

Im studying this currently myself so apologies if I am saying what you already know
 
Last edited:
neu said:
235 is fissle as it's activation energy/fissile barrier, the energy required to cause irreversible deformation of the nucleus is very low.

If you look at the semi empirical mass formula the coulomb and surface area terms reduce and increase respectivly (like a harmonic oscillator) when a neutron is absorbed by the nucleus. If the energy is great enough the coulomb term dominates and causes an irreversible deformation which leads to break up of the nucleus.

the activation energy is the energy required to do this

Im studying this currently myself so apologies if I am saying what you already know

if he knewed he wouldn´t asked ;)
 
##|\Psi|^2=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\exp(\frac{-(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##\braket{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx\,x\exp(-\frac{(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##y=x-x_0 \quad x=y+x_0 \quad dy=dx.## The boundaries remain infinite, I believe. ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dy(y+x_0)\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2}).## ##\frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,y\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2})+\frac{2x_0}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,\exp(-\frac{y^2}{b^2}).## I then resolved the two...
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
It's given a gas of particles all identical which has T fixed and spin S. Let's ##g(\epsilon)## the density of orbital states and ##g(\epsilon) = g_0## for ##\forall \epsilon \in [\epsilon_0, \epsilon_1]##, zero otherwise. How to compute the number of accessible quantum states of one particle? This is my attempt, and I suspect that is not good. Let S=0 and then bosons in a system. Simply, if we have the density of orbitals we have to integrate ##g(\epsilon)## and we have...

Similar threads

Back
Top