Why does Toricelli's Principle result in an exponential function for h vs. t?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Muzly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Principle
AI Thread Summary
Toricelli's Principle describes the flow of fluid from a tank through a small hole, leading to a relationship between height (h) and time (t). While the velocity of the jet (V_jet) and mass flow rate are linear over time, the height of the fluid in the tank exhibits a non-linear, exponential decay. This is derived from the relationship between mass flow rate and height, where the mass flow rate is proportional to the height, resulting in a differential equation that reveals h as an exponential function of time. The analysis shows that as fluid exits the tank, the height decreases exponentially rather than quadratically. Thus, the height vs. time graph reflects an exponential decay due to the nature of fluid dynamics described by Toricelli's Principle.
Muzly
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
OK - I'm working on Toricelli's Principle at the moment. That is, a tank where there's a small hole at the bottom and we're supposed to plot h (height) vs. t (time), V_jet vs. t, mass flow rate vs. t, and change in height vs. t.

Now - I get a linear graph for V_jet and mass flow rate vs. time, but a non-linear curve for h and mass in the tank vs time. And I can't prove it.

We're neglecting any internal energy transfers, etc. just plain old V = Sqrt(2.g.h)

Any help muchly appreciated.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If "mass flow rate" vs time is linear, rate= kt, then mass moved out of the tank will be quadratice in time: (1/2)kt2; so of course, the mass in the tank will be quadratic.
 
Let mass vs t is v(kg/min) so : h' =-A*v( A is a constant)
And we can see that v is linearly propotional to h or v=B*h
then combine the two we have:
h'=-C*h
Solve this differential equation, we have the function h=D*exp(-k.t). So h=f(t) is not a quadratic, it's an exponential.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top