Solve Inequation Problem with Peanuts and Chocolate Chips

  • Thread starter Thread starter enoc
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Jim's assignment involves creating a maximum of 400g of biscuits with at least 180g of carbohydrates from peanuts and chocolate chips. The initial inequality for total mass is p + c < 400, where p is the mass of peanuts and c is the mass of chocolate chips. The carbohydrates provided by peanuts and chocolate chips lead to the inequality 0.30p + 0.60c > 180. A suggestion was made to rearrange the second inequality to c > 300 - 0.5p for clarity. The discussion concludes with a prompt to determine the range of allowable masses for both ingredients.
enoc
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm stuck in a school assignment and would like some advice if it's not to much bother.


Jim makes high energy biscuits using peanuts and chocolate chips. Jim wanted to make a maximum of 400g of biscuits but wanted the biscuits to contain at least 180g of carbohydrates

1.
If we let the mass of the peanuts be p and the mass of the chocolate chips be c, written an inequation to represent the fact that the total mass must be less than 400g. Assume the mass of chocolate chips is the range(y) and the mass of peanuts is the domain(x)

My answer:

Mass of peanuts = p Mass of chocolate chips = c

p + c < 400

c < 400 - p

Hope that's right

2.
The peanuts provide 30% of their mass in carbohydrates and the chocolate chips provide 60% of their mass in carbohydrates. Write an inequation that represents the fact that the mass of carbohydrates must be greater than 180g.

My answer:

0.30p + 0.60c > 180

0.60c > 180 - 0.30p



Any comments will be much appreciated .
Thanks :smile:
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Looks good to me.

For the last inequality you had,

.60c > 180 - .30p

you might want to divide through by .6 in order to get an expression for only c, i.e.

c > 300 - .5p

cookiemonster

Edit: Fixed.
 
Last edited:
I think cookiemonster has the inequality going the wrong way.


Anyways, do you think you can make the next step, and figure out the range of allowable masses for the peanuts and chocolate chips?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top