Energy loss converting water to hydrogen then back to water

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the energy loss involved in converting water to hydrogen through electrolysis and then back to water using a fuel cell. The efficiency of these processes can vary significantly based on the methods used, with potential efficiencies around 90% mentioned. Utilizing low-cost electricity for hydrogen production and selling electricity at a higher rate can yield financial benefits. The feasibility of building a hydrogen generator, storage, and fuel cell for home use is also considered, suggesting it could be a worthwhile investment. Overall, understanding the energy loss and efficiency can lead to profitable applications in hydrogen energy systems.
mrwabba
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
i was doing a little thinking and have a pretty good idea but to see if it will even come close working i need to know how much energy loss is there converting water to hydrogen then back to water. using Electrolysis to split the water and a fuel cell to rejoin them back together. i know you can't get as much energy back as i put in just need to know the loss. in a percentage would work best.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, Mrwabba. The efficiency of both processes depends upon how your approach them. There are different ways of doing both.
 
If you used low cost electictiy to make the hydogen and then produced electricity for a higher cost you come out in front where it counts in the wallet.

Where I live night rate electicity is 8c/kWhr and day rate 22c/kWhr. If the efficency of the process was say 90% there is a way to make money. Each kilowatt hour of electricy would reep a nett return of 13c/kWhr.

Is it posiable to build a hydogen generator, storage cylinder and fuel cell relativly cheeply - might be worth building one for home use.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top