What are the copyright regulations for copying problems from textbooks?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Books
AI Thread Summary
Concerns about copyright laws when copying problems from textbooks are common among users. It is generally understood that copying individual problems verbatim falls under the "fair use" provision, especially for educational purposes. Many problems in physics textbooks are over a century old, and their repetition in various forms is widespread. Users are reassured that as long as they do not copy extensive sections or entire chapters, they are unlikely to face legal issues. Paraphrasing problems can lead to miscommunication, so it is advisable to quote them directly. Scanning and attaching problems to posts is also permissible. Citing the source of the problems can be beneficial for context, although it is not mandatory. Overall, the consensus is that copying textbook problems for educational discussion is acceptable and not a violation of copyright.
ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1
I always feel kind of scared that I am violating a copyright law when I copy problems from textbooks in posts even though I always try to paraphrase. However, this is not really possible when it comes to equations and is not really feasible with the more intricate problems sometimes.

Does anyone know what the copyright regulations are for problems in textbooks? Is it illegal to copy problems verbatim?

Is it illegal to just scan the problem and attach it to your post instead of typesetting all of that LaTeX?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
......no
 
Most of the problems in physics textbooks are about 100 years old (at least in the mechanics chapters). The same problems are recreated over and over. Even the new ones that try to be "fresh" (Jimmy downloads 8 pirated songs into his iPod, how many coulombs...) are the same old problems with new nouns.
 
Chi Meson said:
Jimmy downloads 8 pirated songs into his iPod, how many coulombs...

:smile::smile: I have seen so many questions that are like that. Trying to make 100 year old problems new and cool just doesn't work...:rolleyes:
 
Don't worry about it. Seriously. You only get in trouble with copy write once you copy like... over 1/4 of an article or more than a chapter in a book. And unless your making profit, no one's really going to hunt you down about it either. A librarian would be the person to ask for details though.
 
Oh man, I break the law when I copy math questions for later refrence?

no0o0o0o0...is this really a serious question!?
 
Unlike everything else in existence:

math cannot be copyrighted.
(although according to US law I'm pretty sure it is, but no body cares)
 
yeah, the RIAA isn't so much in business with anyone who writes textbooks. you shouldn't worry about getting into any type of legal trouble at all because of copy writing textbooks.

some mentors here might give you s**t, but i don't think so.
 
concrete mathematics by graham/knuth/patashnik is the only book i know of that gives the source of the problems. they noted that books of chess problems are really uptight about where they get their problems from & carried over the diea to their math text. like chi meson said, a lot of the problems in books are 100 years old or more, and nobody seems to care where they came from originally. (except graham/knuth/patashnik) actually I've wondered where problems came from, and what the original solver was working on at the time, since math texts don't usually relate the either the problem or solution to real life which is almost always where problems come from.
 
  • #10
Chi Meson said:
Jimmy downloads 8 pirated songs into his iPod, how many coulombs...
:smile: I'm in my chair DYING of laughter :smile:
 
  • #11
ehrenfest said:
I always feel kind of scared that I am violating a copyright law when I copy problems from textbooks in posts even though I always try to paraphrase. However, this is not really possible when it comes to equations and is not really feasible with the more intricate problems sometimes.

Does anyone know what the copyright regulations are for problems in textbooks? Is it illegal to copy problems verbatim?

Is it illegal to just scan the problem and attach it to your post instead of typesetting all of that LaTeX?
In the copyright law, there is language for the provision of 'fair use'. Copying a problem is 'fair use'.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use

TITLE 17 > CHAPTER 1 > § 107 Prev | Next
§ 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000107----000-.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
ehrenfest said:
I always feel kind of scared that I am violating a copyright law when I copy problems from textbooks in posts even though I always try to paraphrase.
DO NOT try to paraphrase a question. It is not a copyright violation to write down a complete question verbatim from a text. Paraphrasing often leads to miscommunication.

Is it illegal to just scan the problem and attach it to your post instead of typesetting all of that LaTeX?
No, it is not illegal. Copying individual questions is definitely considered fair use.
 
  • #13
Copying a problem from a book you own in order to ask for help on your homework to better learn a subject falls within the category of educational fair use, as has been mentioned above.

What would NOT be allowed is someone asking for a complete set of homework questions copied for them, or downloading entire chapters of a textbook that have been scanned into a file online, in order to avoid buying the textbook themselves.

We also have no problem if you wish to add to your homework question a citation for the textbook you are using, such as the authors/editors, title and edition, and chapter the question comes from. We don't require this, and it's not a substitute for writing out the question since not everyone helping with homework owns every textbook ever published, but for those who are familiar with the book, it might help them know what content you have covered so far to know not to go over your head with help. And the book publishers probably won't mind having their textbooks plugged.
 
  • #14
  • #15
i been looking for this thread! arghhh finally.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
849
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
71
Views
858
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top