Moment of inertia corrected with relativity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The moment of inertia for a solid sphere is conventionally defined as 2/5 mr². However, at relativistic speeds, some sources claim it changes to 1/2 mr², though derivations are scarce. The discussion highlights a hyperelastic model for calculating the moment of inertia of a relativistic hoop, referenced in Greg Egan's online work. It emphasizes the necessity of considering material stresses and the limitations of existing models, particularly when assumptions lead to non-physical outcomes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics, specifically moment of inertia
  • Familiarity with relativistic physics concepts
  • Knowledge of hyperelastic material models
  • Basic grasp of angular momentum and its relationship to angular velocity
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of moment of inertia in relativistic contexts
  • Study Greg Egan's hyperelastic model for relativistic hoops
  • Explore the limitations of hyperelastic models in physics
  • Learn about the relationship between angular momentum and angular frequency in rotating bodies
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mechanical engineers, and students studying advanced mechanics, particularly those interested in the effects of relativity on rotational dynamics.

pangsiukwong
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi!

The moment of inertia of solid sphere is 2/5 mr^2. However, when the sphere spins at light velocity, some articles state the moment of inertia is equal to 1/2 mr^2. However, no derivation is found in those articles.

Would you suggest some articles / textbooks which show the derivation of the moment of inertia equal to 1/2 mr^2?

Patrick
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would very much like to know what your source was for the above remarks about the moment of inertia of a solid sphere.

There is some information online which would allow you to calculate the moment of inertia of a relativistic hoop (and perhaps a disk) using some assumptions about the material, i.e. a so-called hyperelastic model, at:

http://www.gregegan.net/SCIENCE/Rings/Rings.html

This is based in part upon an online discussion here at
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=168121

However, I am not aware of anyone textbook or article which goes through a similar derivation, nor am I aware of anyone analyzing the case of a sphere.

The above discussion is the best available information of which I am aware on this problem - it should not, however, be viewed as authoritative as that from a textbook.

The reason that a model of elasticity is needed to calculate the moment of inertia is that the stresses in the hoop (or disk, or sphere) can contribute appreciably to the moment of inertia.

If you look at the plot of angular momentum of a rotating ring vs angular frequency in the above webpage, you will see that the angular momentum actually reaches a peak, implying that the moment of inertia has dropped to zero at a high enough angular velocity.

However, a further analysis shows that when this peak is reached, the model has made non-physical assumptions. Basically, such a model represents a case of a wire that is stronger than is physically possible.

See also the important section on the limitations of the model
http://gregegan.customer.netspace.net.au/SCIENCE/Rings/Rings.html#LIMITATIONS

The model does seem to be reasonably well behaved if one is careful to avoid assumptions that make the wire "too strong". In particular, it is necessary to use values of the constants such that the speed of sound in the wire is below the speed of light in the stretched wire as well as in the unstetched wire in order to get a well-behaved model.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
6K