Should You Pursue Undergrad Research if You Prefer Theory Over Experimentation?

AI Thread Summary
Pursuing theoretical research in graduate school does not necessarily require undergraduate research experience, especially if experimental work is unappealing. However, graduate programs often prefer candidates who demonstrate research productivity, whether through theoretical or experimental avenues. Engaging in any form of undergraduate research can provide valuable skills, such as problem-solving, analytical thinking, and teamwork, which are crucial for a career in science. Even if the research is not directly related to future goals, it can offer insights into the scientific process and foster unexpected ideas. Additionally, contributing to calculations or computational work can be a viable alternative for those leaning towards theory. Overall, while not mandatory, undergraduate research is beneficial for developing a well-rounded skill set.
ice109
Messages
1,707
Reaction score
6
im pretty sure i want to do theory in grad school because i don't like experiment. so i don't really want to do undergrad research that involves turning knobs and righting down numbers. nor am i able to contribute to a theory group. what am i to do? would research in math be sufficient? do i really have to do undergrad research?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ice109 said:
im pretty sure i want to do theory in grad school because i don't like experiment. so i don't really want to do undergrad research that involves turning knobs and righting down numbers. nor am i able to contribute to a theory group. what am i to do? would research in math be sufficient? do i really have to do undergrad research?

You don't have to do anything. However I'm sure grad schools would like to see proof that you will be a productive researcher, be it theoretical or based on lab findings. Your graduate research does not need to be related to any undergrad projects. Find a professor who's involved in something that is even close to your interests and see if he/she would like an assistant.
 
ice109 said:
im pretty sure i want to do theory in grad school because i don't like experiment. so i don't really want to do undergrad research that involves turning knobs and righting down numbers. nor am i able to contribute to a theory group. what am i to do? would research in math be sufficient? do i really have to do undergrad research?
any kind of undergraduate research helps in the bigger picture. remember you won't be learning just what you are apparently doing (eg. learning how to turn the knots on the CRO or how to enter data in Excel), what is more valuable is to understand the process of research: the thinking through, the ability to tackle unexpected challenges, the skills in analysis, making rational decisions when you can't do everything and when things turn out to be non-ideal, how to communicate your results to others, how to work as in a small team etc.

besides more general knowledge doesn't hurt. A good ideas can come from anywhere... usually places you least expect! good luck
 
I'm just going into my fourth year of a Physics degree and I'm currently doing undergrad research. Take it from me, it''s incredibly valuable. Even if it's nothing to with your desired PhD, there is so much else to learn! You get so many valuable insights into life AS a scientist. Your work will probably be minor, but that isn't really the point of it!
 
While you mentioned possible experimental and theoretical contributions from an undergraduate doing research, another way is to help do calculations, analytically or computationally (possibly using tools like Java, C++, Python, or Maple).
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
82
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
4K
Back
Top