Finding Treasure with a Gallows & Two Trees

  • Thread starter Thread starter jackiefrost
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The treasure hunt problem involves locating buried treasure using directions that reference a gallows and two trees, an oak and a pine. The key to solving the problem lies in understanding complex numbers, where turning 90 degrees is achieved through multiplication by i or -i. The solution shows that the exact location of the gallows is not necessary, as the midpoint between two calculated stakes based on the trees' locations can be determined mathematically. The discussion highlights the cleverness of the problem and its connection to George Gamow, who used humor and complex concepts in his work. Ultimately, the treasure can be found solely using the trees and the provided directions.
jackiefrost
Messages
140
Reaction score
1
I came across this amusing treasure hunt problem in a book on the history of complex numbers. The author got it from George Gamow's classic, "One, Two, Three, Infinity". I'll paraphrase.

Directions:
Long ago pirates buried a treasure on a certain desolate island. No longer desolate, while vacationing on the island you discover the original directions for locating the treasure. The directions only involve a gallows (pirates, you know) and two conspicuous trees. One tree is an oak, the other a pine.

The directions for locating the treasure are as follows:
Walk from the gallows straight to the oak, counting your steps. Turn exactly 90 degrees to the right and walk in a straight line the counted number of steps. Drive a stake at that location. Now, go back to the gallows and walk to the pine tree, again, counting your steps. At the pine tree turn exactly 90 degrees to the left. At the pine walk the distance that you just determined by step counting. Drive a second stake. The treasure is buried under the midpoint between the two stakes.

That's pretty easy except for one ugly problem; you know precisely where the two conspicuous trees are located on the island but any trace of a pirates' gallows has long since disappeared. Can you still find the treasure with only the trees and the directions to go on?

[The intention of both authors was convey awe at the "magical" utility of complex numbers but when a treasure is involved I guess anything goes]
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It 's found in the above book, and on the internet. Concerns the fact that multiplication of a point in the complex plane connected to the origin by i turns it 90 degrees left, and by -i turns 90 degrees clockwise. Place the elm and oak conveniently at (-1,0) and (1,0).

Before the thread vanishes, I will indicate the method. Suppose we take the one connected with oak at (1,0) and the right turn. That's -i(G-1), but we want that connected to the point (1,0), so we get -i(G-1)-1. The other is i(G+1)+1, and the midpoint is {-i(G-1)-1 +i(G+1)+1}/2 = i.

Which shows that to know the position of the gallows is unnecessary.
 
Last edited:
Incidently, this is Gamow of Big Bang fame. He was also a famous prankster and a gifted expositor.
 
I wish to add, he defected from the Soviet Union in 1934 and was once described by a United Press reporter as "The only scientist in America with a real sense of humor"
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top