Explaining the Continued Fraction Identity for arctan(x)

  • Thread starter Thread starter rbzima
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fraction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the identity relating the sum of terms involving a series of coefficients (a_0, a_1, a_2, etc.) to a continued fraction representation of arctan(x). It emphasizes that rewriting the right-hand side as a product can clarify how the identity emerges. Participants note that analyzing the identity recursively by defining nth convergents can provide a rigorous approach. Additionally, the conversation highlights that the Taylor series for arctan(x) converges slowly compared to the faster convergence of the continued fraction. The mention of Machin's formula illustrates the practical implications of convergence rates in calculating π.
rbzima
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble understanding a simple identity and was wondering if anyone could explain it to me:

Why is it that a_{o}+a_{1}+a_{1}a_{2}+a_{1}a_{2}a_{3}+a_{1}a_{2}a_{3}a_{4}... is equivalent to the continued fraction in the form:a_{0}+\frac{a_{1}}{1-\frac{a_{2}}{1+a_{2}-\frac{a_{3}}{1+a_{3}-...}}}}

What then should I do to make arctan(x) look something like the above continued fraction. Any advice would be fantastic!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The a0 term is obvious. Just focus on the continued fraction itself:

a_{0}+\frac{a_{1}}{1-\frac{a_{2}}{1+a_{2}-\frac{a_{3}}{1+a_{3}-...}}}} =<br /> a_1+a_1a_2 + a_1a_2a_3 + a_1a_2a_3a_4 +\cdots

Rewriting the RHS as

a_1(1+a_2(1+a_3(1+a_4(\cdots

might help you see how this identity falls out.

To do this rigorously, look at the identity recursively by defining the nth convergent that results by setting a_{n+1}, a_{n+2}, \cdots to zero.

I have to run off to work, so I can't help much more. Final note: The Taylor series for arctan(x) converges very slowly. The convergence of the continued fraction is much, much faster.
 
D H said:
The a0 term is obvious. Just focus on the continued fraction itself:

a_{0}+\frac{a_{1}}{1-\frac{a_{2}}{1+a_{2}-\frac{a_{3}}{1+a_{3}-...}}}} =<br /> a_1+a_1a_2 + a_1a_2a_3 + a_1a_2a_3a_4 +\cdots

Rewriting the RHS as

a_1(1+a_2(1+a_3(1+a_4(\cdots

might help you see how this identity falls out.

To do this rigorously, look at the identity recursively by defining the nth convergent that results by setting a_{n+1}, a_{n+2}, \cdots to zero.

I have to run off to work, so I can't help much more. Final note: The Taylor series for arctan(x) converges very slowly. The convergence of the continued fraction is much, much faster.

Thanks bro! I never saw the multiplicative form before, so that helps a lot. BTW, I figured that the Taylor series for arctan(x) was a slower convergence. When you use Machin's formula for \frac{\pi}{4}, it requires 71 terms until you reach convergence with 100 decimal place accuracy.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top