Can Traveling at the Speed of Light Lead to Time Travel and Other Mysteries?

  • Thread starter Thread starter _Mayday_
  • Start date Start date
_Mayday_
Messages
808
Reaction score
0
Hey, there are a few things I would like to clear up in my mind.

I was talking to a mate today at school, and he was talking about the speed of light. He was saying that if you could travel the speed of light you could arrive somewhere before you left? He then went on to say that if you were traveling at the speed of light you would actually be going back in time?

This raised a few questions in my mind.

- Firstly, does that hold any truth? I can't picture that in my head, he could possibly have been talking about thta in terms of any image that you could see (If slowed down considerably)

- The whole going back in time idea, I am very sure holds no truth but I have seen some theory similar using light and mirrors or something?

- Is it actually possible for something to move at the speed of light? Obviously excluding light itself, I thought I read somewhere that before something reached that speed something happenned and it could never actually reach that speed.

Any explanation would be great. Thanks.EDIT:

Just another two questions.

Ok I've heard that if you continue traveling in space you will eventually end up where you started? If so is there an explanation to this?

I've also heard that if you go far enough into space, you will eventually be able to see the formation of the universe, or the big bang? As the light is still traveling through space, so if you "could catch up with it" could you see the big bang?Pretty random questions, and not all really related, but they've been playing on my mind =]
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
CrawfordK said:
I was talking to a mate today at school, and he was talking about the speed of light. He was saying that if you could travel the speed of light you could arrive somewhere before you left?
If you could go faster than the speed of light you could arrive before you left!
This is one of the reasons you can't go faster than light!
Nothing with mass can travel at the speed of light.
 
mgb_phys said:
If you could go faster than the speed of light you could arrive before you left!
This is one of the reasons you can't go faster than light!
Nothing with mass can travel at the speed of light.


Is there an explanation for why mass cannot travel at the speed of light? It would be interesting to read a bit into it, the answer is probably an obvious one to most, but I'm not really sure?
 
The simple explantnation is that the equations of Special Relativity say that mass increases as it reaches the speed of light and reaches infinity at the speed of light, so it would take an infinite amoutn of energy, but this is ather arguing in circles.

Strictly speaking no information can travel faster than light because this would lead to problems with causality, effects happening before causes!
There are a lot of good books and articles about Special Relativity.
 
mgb_phys said:
The simple explantnation is that the equations of Special Relativity say that mass increases as it reaches the speed of light and reaches infinity at the speed of light, so it would take an infinite amoutn of energy, but this is ather arguing in circles.

Strictly speaking no information can travel faster than light because this would lead to problems with causality, effects happening before causes!
There are a lot of good books and articles about Special Relativity.

Thanks, that has helped a lot with that question. The only problem I have with reading into some of these things is that, they seem very complex. :/
 
Ok thanks, I understand it now cheers for all the help! =]
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top