Minimum possible energy for a particle in a box

cojewmaw
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have a homework problem that is giving me some problems.

Consider a particle trapped in a box of size 1. All you know is that the particle is in the box. From that you can find what is called the lowest possible energy for that particle. What you really find is the energy expected for a particle whose momentum is zero but with som minimal error bar. If you say that p=0 +/- delta p, then you're really saying that the particle might as well have p=delta p. From that you can find the minimum possible energy of a particle in a box (and note that it's not 0!) (not 0 factoral, that's 1).

So I need to find the lowest possible energy. I really don't know where to start, any help would be very useful!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could use the formula E=p^2/2m (good for a state with clearly defined p) and replace p with dp (since this is a typical value of p, if your distribution is centered at p=0). You can get minimum value for dp from uncertainity principle. But you must know that this is only an aproximation: exact calculation involves solving Schrödinger's equation.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top