Can Graph Theory Exist Without Visual Graphs?

AI Thread Summary
Graph theory can exist without visual representations, as its foundational definitions focus on set relationships rather than pictorial elements. While some argue that modern mathematics increasingly favors algebraic approaches over visual aids, others contend that contemporary textbooks incorporate more graphs than ever. The debate highlights a tension between abstract mathematical concepts and the utility of visual aids in understanding. Despite the possibility of studying graph theory without diagrams, many find that visual representations enhance comprehension. Ultimately, the role of visuals in graph theory remains a contentious topic in the mathematical community.
tgt
Messages
519
Reaction score
2
From the definition of a graph, it dosen't mention anything about a pictorial graph. Things are only dealt with set wise so it is possible to do graph theory without graphs? It would be extremely unnatural though.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes it is possible to do graph theory without pictures. Modern mathematics has a desire to take things away from pictures and move it into algebra, which is a shame really. Entire textbooks go without a single diagram these days...
 
Gib Z said:
Yes it is possible to do graph theory without pictures. Modern mathematics has a desire to take things away from pictures and move it into algebra, which is a shame really. Entire textbooks go without a single diagram these days...

I find it the opposite, I think that modern mathematics is growing more pictorial. Now every single explanation has a graph to go with it, and textbooks usually more graphs than ever, since the theory is more developed, with new aspects on calculus etc.
 
Gib Z said:
Yes it is possible to do graph theory without pictures. Modern mathematics has a desire to take things away from pictures and move it into algebra, which is a shame really. Entire textbooks go without a single diagram these days...

Have you done graph theory with pictures?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top