Le Chatelier's Principle - What is an equilibrium shift?

AI Thread Summary
Le Chatelier's Principle explains that when a system at equilibrium experiences stress, it shifts to counteract that change and restore balance. A shift to the right indicates an increase in the concentration of products, while a shift to the left indicates an increase in reactants. The rate of reaction increases temporarily after a disturbance, but equilibrium is reestablished when the forward and reverse reaction rates equalize again. The amounts of reactants and products at equilibrium are not necessarily equal, and only changes in the concentration of aqueous or gaseous substances affect the equilibrium position. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping how chemical reactions respond to changes in conditions.
jumbogala
Messages
414
Reaction score
4
[SOLVED] Le Chatelier's Principle - What is an equilibrium shift?

When my chemistry textbook says, "the equilibrium shifts to the right", what does it mean?

Is it increasing the rate of the forward reaction to accomplish this?

If a shift in equilibrium is not a change in the rate of reaction, then what is it?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Equations go back and forth from reactant side to product side. In other words you go from NaCl to Na + Cl back to NaCl. So, to the right would mean more Na + Cl. I think that's right, maybe someone will smack me for error.
 
Le Chatelier's principle states that if stress is placed on a reaction in equilibrium, the reaction will push itself in either direction to re-establish the equilibrium. Think of the reaction as a see-saw. Using jumbogala's example:

Na+ + Cl- <=> NaCl

In this equilibrium, the amounts of salt (right) and ions (left) are balanced. If you were to add salt to this reaction, it would force the reaction to the left, producing more reactants (The see-saw's right end is pushed downward, so the reaction must push the left side downward to compensate). It works the same way in the opposite direction.

If we were to remove chloride ions (pushing the see-saw upward on the left), the reaction would shift to the left toward reactants (pushes the see-saw upward on the right).

The rate of reaction only designates how quickly the equilibrium is corrected, not how much of what is created.
 


Just be careful how you word that-the amounts of Na+ and Cl- are not necessarily (in fact, rarely) equal at equilibrium. Also, if the NaCl is a solid, then addition of NaCl will not affect equilibrium, as only concentrations of aqueous or gaseous substances will affect the position of equilibrium.

To go back to the original question, immediately after the disturbance, yes, the forward reaction rate increases. As equilibrium is reestablished, the forward and reverse reaction rates become equal again. So the system was originally at equilibrium, a disturbance occurs, the system adjusts, and a new equilibrium position is established.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top