Excess Charge Distribution on Grounded Metal Cup

AI Thread Summary
When a positively charged sphere is lowered into a grounded metal cup, it induces a negative charge on the outside surface of the cup while leaving the inside surface neutral. The grounding allows the cup to redistribute charges, but once the grounding is disconnected, the negative charge remains only on the exterior. The inside surface of the cup does not hold any charge because the electric field within a conductor is zero, as demonstrated by Gauss's law. Consequently, any charge present must reside on the outer surface, confirming that the inside surface remains uncharged. This behavior is consistent with the principles governing conductors in electrostatic equilibrium.
terminator88
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
A small positively charged sphere is lowered by a nonconducting threead into a grounded metal cup without touching the inside surface of the cup.The grounding wire attached to the outside surface is disconnected and the charged sphere is then removed from cup.What is the distribution of excess charge on surface of the cup?

Answer:Negative charge resides on the outside surface and no charge resides on the inside surface

I understand tht there is only negative charge but I don't understand why the negative charge isn't also on the inside surface...is it because all charges are always on the outer surface of a conductor?
But the inside surface of the cup is also the outer surface of the conductor?
Can anyone please explain...thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Say there were some non-zero charge on the inside surface of the sphere. Then you can construct a closed Gaussian surface lying entirely between the outer and inner surface. The charge enclosed by the Gaussian surface is ##q_{enc.}=-Q##. The total electric flux through the surface is ##\Phi_E=0## because the electric field everywhere on the Gaussian surface is zero since the surface is entirely inside the conductor. Now Gauss's law says ##\Phi_E=\dfrac{q_{enc}}{\epsilon_0}##. Since the left side is zero, the right side must also be zero. Therefore ##q_{enc.}## must be zero, i.e. there is no charge of any sign on the inside surface.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top