Brain Death in Frogs: Is it True?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Brain Death
AI Thread Summary
Frogs can be frozen and later revived, with some discussions suggesting they exhibit no brain activity during this state. The concept of stasis versus brain death is explored, with reduced metabolic activity indicating stasis rather than death. While frogs can survive freezing at temperatures around -5 degrees Celsius, human cryogenics involves much lower temperatures, potentially complicating cellular metabolism. The distinction between metabolic activity and measurable brain activity, such as EEG readings, is emphasized, with speculation that there may be minimal biochemical reactions occurring without electrical activity. The lack of definitive studies on brain activity in frozen frogs leaves room for further investigation into their physiological state during freezing.
Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
8,194
Reaction score
2,457
I just heard a scientist say that when frozen, frogs have NO brain activity, but that they can still be revived. Is this true? I knew that frogs could be frozen and revived, but I had never heard the claim about brain activity. If this is true, then when is a frog brain dead, and what is the difference between stasis and brain death; cell death?

Is this why people think we could be frozen and later revived with our consciousness intact?
 
Last edited:
Biology news on Phys.org
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/sciencenow/3209/05-ask.html" .

Given the statement that anaerobic glycolysis still occurs to meet the greatly reduced demand for energy, I'd suggest that significantly reduced metabolic activity indicates a state of stasis. Lack of metabolic activity would suggest (immanent) death.

I'm not very familiar with the human cryogenics issue, but aren't they freezing at temperatures well below the -5 degrees Celsius mentioned for frogs? Some minimal level of cellular metabolism is still possible in frogs, it seems, under those conditions. Being frozen at -100 deg. Celsius is a whole different manner, even with lots of cryoprotectant.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Does "metabolic activity" imply "brain activity" such as we might measure with an EEG, or does this relate only to the supply of nutrients for the cells?
 
I would not imagine there to be any electrical activity as measurable by an EEG to be present, simply just a very low baseline activity of biochemical reactions("metabolic activity"). There's no circulation, no sense in propagating nerve signals as the frog is otherwise frozen, just a very slow turnover over the nutrients that are already present in the frog's cells.

Of course, this is just my speculation as, like the scientist on the NOVA page notes, there are no definitive published accounts regarding brain activity in frozen frogs. I would imagine that one would need to monitor the frozen frog for the entire period of its low-temperature hibernation - maybe there's very, very low-frequency behavior going on that otherwise goes undetected.
 
Mike H said:
Of course, this is just my speculation as, like the scientist on the NOVA page notes, there are no definitive published accounts regarding brain activity in frozen frogs. I would imagine that one would need to monitor the frozen frog for the entire period of its low-temperature hibernation - maybe there's very, very low-frequency behavior going on that otherwise goes undetected.

Yes, whether or not there are very low levels of electrical activity would seem to have profound implications; that is to say, if indeed there is no electrical activity.
 
Last edited:
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Back
Top