Why Can't We Significantly Boost ICE Auto Efficiency?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PRDan4th
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Auto Efficiency
AI Thread Summary
Improving the efficiency of internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles can be achieved through heat recovery systems and regenerative braking. Heat recovery can utilize lost radiator heat to generate additional torque or electricity, while regenerative braking can convert braking energy into electricity. These methods may be particularly beneficial in hybrid vehicles, where electricity plays a larger role in fuel consumption. Various companies are already implementing these strategies to enhance efficiency. Ongoing innovations in hybrid vehicle technology continue to explore these concepts for better fuel economy.
PRDan4th
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Why can't we improve the efficiency (miles/gallon) of ICE autos?

It seems to me there are two areas that can be used to add efficiency:

1) Heat recovery with some form of a "bottoming cycle" to generate additional torque or electricity from heat lost in the radiator, and

2) Breaking energy - generating electricity from engaging an alternator when the brake pedal is used, or maybe when the driver takes his foot of the gas. A lot of energy is wasted in breaking.

These may be more important in hybrid vehicles where electricity is being used in a greater proportion of the fuel mix.

Has anyone here looked at this?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
PRDan4th said:
Why can't we improve the efficiency (miles/gallon) of ICE autos?

It seems to me there are two areas that can be used to add efficiency:

1) Heat recovery with some form of a "bottoming cycle" to generate additional torque or electricity from heat lost in the radiator, and

2) Breaking energy - generating electricity from engaging an alternator when the brake pedal is used, or maybe when the driver takes his foot of the gas. A lot of energy is wasted in breaking.

These may be more important in hybrid vehicles where electricity is being used in a greater proportion of the fuel mix.

Has anyone here looked at this?

These are all good ideas. And they are already being implemented by various companies around the world. You might want to check the https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=232274" for even more ideas.

I'm working on a gas, steam, electric, pneumatic, hydraulic, spring, and flywheel hybrid vehicle. With pedals as an option of course.:smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'I need a concave mirror with a focal length length of 150 feet'
I need to cut down a 3 year old dead tree from top down so tree causes no damage with small pieces falling. I need a mirror with a focal length of 150 ft. 12" diameter to 36" diameter will work good but I can't think of any easy way to build it. Nothing like this for sale on Ebay. I have a 30" Fresnel lens that I use to burn stumps it works great. Tree service wants $2000.
Hi all, i have some questions about the tesla turbine: is a tesla turbine more efficient than a steam engine or a stirling engine ? about the discs of the tesla turbine warping because of the high speed rotations; does running the engine on a lower speed solve that or will the discs warp anyway after time ? what is the difference in efficiency between the tesla turbine running at high speed and running it at a lower speed ( as fast as possible but low enough to not warp de discs) and: i...
Back
Top