Graphing vectors with a calculator or apple computer

AI Thread Summary
Graphing three-dimensional vectors on calculators and software like Apple Grapher can be challenging due to format and input requirements. Users often struggle to find the correct method to represent x-y-z coordinates effectively. The discussion highlights confusion over whether to graph the vector as a line from the origin to its endpoint. Clarification on input formats for Texas Instruments calculators and Apple Grapher software is sought. Understanding the specific steps for visualizing vectors in a Cartesian coordinate system is essential for successful graphing.
casanova2528
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
why is it so difficult to graph a 3 dimensional vector on any bloody calculator? I can't even seem to find the right format to graph a x-y-z vector on my new imac grapher software.

does anybody know how to graph a vector on a cartesian coordinate system using a texas instrument calculator or on the apple grapher software?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
do you just mean the line from the origin to the coordinate the vector points to?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top