[prove] monotonicity of function

  • Thread starter Thread starter Дьявол
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the monotonicity of the function f(x) = ln(x-1) over the interval E = (1, ∞). Participants analyze the conditions for monotonicity, noting that the function is monotonically increasing if for any x1 < x2 in E, f(x1) < f(x2). A key approach involves manipulating the logarithmic expression to show that ln((x1-1)/(x2-1)) < 0, confirming that f(x1) < f(x2). Additionally, there is a suggestion to use derivatives for a more straightforward proof, but participants also explore alternative methods to validate their findings. Overall, the consensus is that the function is indeed monotonically increasing on the specified interval.
Дьявол
Messages
365
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that the function is monotonic, and if so find if it increases or decreases monotonically.

f(x)=ln(x-1), E=(1,∞) where E ⊆ Df


Homework Equations



a) monotonically increasing if the set E ⊆ Df for arbitrary numbers x1, x2 ∊ E and x1<x2 ⇒ f(x1)<f(x2)

b)monotonically decreasing if the set E ⊆ Df for arbitrary numbers x1, x2 ∊ E and x1<x2 ⇒ f(x1)>f(x2)

The Attempt at a Solution



So we need to start with x1<x2. Now:
f(x1)-f(x2)=ln(x1-1)-ln(x2-1)=
=ln\frac{x_1-1}{x_2-1}=ln\frac{x_2-1+x_1-x_2}{x_2-1}=ln(1+\frac{x_1-x_2}{x_2-1})
But I am stuck in here proving, so I tried:
x_1&lt;x_2 ; x_1-1&lt;x_2-1 ; \frac{x_1-1}{x_2-1}&lt;\frac{x_2-1}{x_2-1} ; \frac{x_1-1}{x_2-1}&lt;1 ; ln\frac{x_1-1}{x_2-1}&lt;ln(1) ; ln\frac{x_1-1}{x_2-1}&lt;0
so f(x1)-f(x2)<0 and f(x1)<f(x2) and the function is monotonically increasing. Is this correct? Can I always use this method?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Дьявол said:

Homework Statement


Show that the function is monotonic, and if so find if it increases or decreases monotonically.

f(x)=ln(x-1), E=(1,∞) where E ⊆ Df


Homework Equations



a) monotonically increasing if the set E ⊆ Df for arbitrary numbers x1, x2 ∊ E and x1<x2 ⇒ f(x1)<f(x2)

b)monotonically decreasing if the set E ⊆ Df for arbitrary numbers x1, x2 ∊ E and x1<x2 ⇒ f(x1)>f(x2)

The Attempt at a Solution



So we need to start with x1<x2. Now:
f(x1)-f(x2)=ln(x1-1)-ln(x2-1)=
=ln\frac{x_1-1}{x_2-1}=ln\frac{x_2-1+x_1-x_2}{x_2-1}=ln(1+\frac{x_1-x_2}{x_2-1})
But I am stuck in here proving, so I tried:
x_1&lt;x_2 ; x_1-1&lt;x_2-1 ; \frac{x_1-1}{x_2-1}&lt;\frac{x_2-1}{x_2-1} ; \frac{x_1-1}{x_2-1}&lt;1 ; ln\frac{x_1-1}{x_2-1}&lt;ln(1) ; ln\frac{x_1-1}{x_2-1}&lt;0
so f(x1)-f(x2)<0 and f(x1)<f(x2) and the function is monotonically increasing. Is this correct? Can I always use this method?

Thanks in advance.
It would be simplest to show that the derivative is always positive or always negative for x\ge 1. Assuming that you are not allowed to or cannot take the derivative what you have done is perfectly valid- and very good! A correct proof, of course, would start with x_1&lt; x_2, progress to ln\frac{x_1-1}{x_2-1}&lt; 0 and then assert that ln(x_1- 1)&lt; ln(x_2-1).
Notice, by the way, that you need x_1&gt;1 and x_2&gt; 1 in order to assert that x_1-1&gt; 0, x_2- 1&gt; 0 so \frac{x_2-1}{x_1-1}&gt; 0 and ln\frac{x_2-1}{x_1-1} exists.
 
Thanks for the post. Yes, I see now that I missed the fact that x1>1 and x2>1 so I could used that fact that x2-1>0 and x1-x2<0 so that out of here:

ln(1+\frac{x_1-x_2}{x_2-1})

-1&lt;\frac{x_1-x_2}{x_2-1}&lt;0

0&lt;1+\frac{x_1-x_2}{x_2-1}&lt;1

and out of here ln(1+\frac{x_1-x_2}{x_2-1})&lt;ln(1)

ln(1+\frac{x_1-x_2}{x_2-1})&lt;0

or it would be much simple if I did:

x1-1>0 and x2-1>0

and

ln\frac{x_1-1}{x_2-1}

so that

0&lt;\frac{x_1-1}{x_2-1}&lt;1

and out of here ln\frac{x_1-1}{x_2-1}&lt;0
 
And what if I have f(x)=3-x ?

x1<x2

f(x1)-f(x2)=3-x1 - 3-x2=1/3x1 - 1/3x2=

Now let's try with LaTeX :smile:

=\frac{3^{x_1}-3^{x_2}}{3^{x_1+x_2}}

Out of x1<x2
log33x1<log33x2

Can I use this method to prove?

Now 3x1<3x2

But how to prove 3x1 + x2>0 ? Or it doesn't need proving?

Now it turns out that f(x1)-f(x2)<0 and f(x1)<f(x2) so that the function is monotonically increasing.
 
Дьявол said:
But how to prove 3x1 + x2>0 ? Or it doesn't need proving?

It seems obvious that any power with a positive base is positive (like the multiplication of positive numbers), but you could always write this down.
 
Can somebody please help with f(x)=x-sin(x), E=(0,п)
x1<x2

f(x_1)-f(x_2)=x_1-sin(x_1)-x_2+sin(x_2)=x_1-x_2+sin(x_2)-sin(x_1)

I am stuck in here. x1-x2<0 and if п>x>0 then 1>sinx>0.

If 1>sin(x2)>0 ; 1-sin(x1)>sin(x2)-sin(x1)>-sin(x1)

If x_2&gt;x_1 ; sin(x_2)&gt;sin(x_1) ; sin(x_2)-sin(x_1)&gt;0

or sin(x_1)&gt;0 ; -sin(x_1)&lt;0 ; 1-sin(x_1)&lt;1 so,

1<sin(x2)-sin(x1)<0 and x1-x2<0

I got plenty of information but I don't know if I am using it correctly.

What should I do now?

Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Since ##px^9+q## is the factor, then ##x^9=\frac{-q}{p}## will be one of the roots. Let ##f(x)=27x^{18}+bx^9+70##, then: $$27\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)^2+b\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)+70=0$$ $$b=27 \frac{q}{p}+70 \frac{p}{q}$$ $$b=\frac{27q^2+70p^2}{pq}$$ From this expression, it looks like there is no greatest value of ##b## because increasing the value of ##p## and ##q## will also increase the value of ##b##. How to find the greatest value of ##b##? Thanks

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
501
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top