What is the relationship between rest energy and frequency in quantum mechanics?

LarryS
Gold Member
Messages
357
Reaction score
33
In QM, the energy of a particle with a non-zero rest mass is Planck's constant times the frequency. How does the energy associated with the rest mass m0c2 fit into this picture? Planck wrote of an "instrinsic frequency" associated with the rest mass. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
referframe said:
In QM, the energy of a particle with a non-zero rest mass is Planck's constant times the frequency. How does the energy associated with the rest mass m0c2 fit into this picture?...

Well, setting
mc^2 = h\nu,
we can express the frequency in terms of the mass:
\nu = \frac{mc^2}{h},
which was first proposed by Louis de Broglie in 1924. Actually, de Broglie derived
\nu = \frac{\gamma mc^2}{h} = \frac{mc^2}{h\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}},
which reduces to the previous expression for v = 0. More information at Wikipedia.
 
daschaich said:
Well, setting
mc^2 = h\nu,
we can express the frequency in terms of the mass:
\nu = \frac{mc^2}{h},
which was first proposed by Louis de Broglie in 1924. Actually, de Broglie derived
\nu = \frac{\gamma mc^2}{h} = \frac{mc^2}{h\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}},
which reduces to the previous expression for v = 0. More information at Wikipedia.

I guess I'm still a little bit confused. So, a particle with a rest mass (m0>0) which is at rest (v = 0) has a non-zero frequency and a non-zero wave length and therefore has a phase velocity while the particle is at rest...?
 
referframe said:
I guess I'm still a little bit confused. So, a particle with a rest mass (m0>0) which is at rest (v = 0) has a non-zero frequency and a non-zero wave length and therefore has a phase velocity while the particle is at rest...?

Sounds like it. In fact, the Wikipedia article I mentioned above links to this one, where we learn that the phase velocity of a massive particle always exceeds the speed of light c: "The superluminal phase velocity does not violate special relativity, for it doesn't carry any information."

The article goes on to contrast the phase velocity with the group velocity and the particle velocity. The particle velocity of a massive particle must be less than c, and is what vanishes for a particle at rest.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top