Momentum transfer in a first class lever

AI Thread Summary
In a seesaw arrangement with masses m1, m2, and m3, the discussion focuses on how momentum is distributed among these masses. The force applied to the fulcrum mass m3 is influenced by the mass of m2, due to its inertia resisting changes in motion. Participants seek clarification on the term "momentum distribution" and its application in this context. The conversation highlights the need for a clearer definition of momentum distribution, especially during collisions between the masses. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for analyzing the system's behavior.
dE_logics
Messages
742
Reaction score
0
We have a seesaw arrangement, a mass m3 supports the fulcrum, we have mass m2 on one end, and a mass m1 fall on the other end with velocity v.

Considering the distance between the fulcrum and m1 is d and that of m2 is r, what will be the momentum distribution?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think -

How much the force is applied to m3 depends on m2's mass, cause the reason why force is applying on m3 is cause of m2's reluctance to change in motion (or cause of inertia).
 
Last edited:
dE_logics said:
We have a seesaw arrangement, a mass m3 supports the fulcrum, we have mass m2 on one end, and a mass m1 fall on the other end with velocity v.

Considering the distance between the fulcrum and m1 is d and that of m2 is r, what will be the momentum distribution?

Hi dE_logics! :smile:

i think nobody's answering because we don't understand the question :redface: …

what do you mean by the "momentum distribution"?

what is the original question? :smile:
 
Momentum distribution between m1, m2 and m3.
 
Now how can I define momentum distribution?

When 2 bodies collide momentum gets distributed...i.e they undergo momentum distribution.
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

Direction of momentum transfer?
Replies
8
Views
2K
Torque and Moment of Inertia of a Lever Arm
Replies
2
Views
3K
Crankshafts, which class of lever
Replies
2
Views
3K
Calculating Final Positions & Velocities for M1, M2 & Spring After DeltaT
Replies
6
Views
2K
Conservation of linear momentum when wheels are included
Replies
11
Views
3K
An intuitive understanding of momentum and kinetic energy
Replies
11
Views
2K
Deriving the lever law using infinitesimals
Replies
10
Views
2K
Momentum, why can we change the system?
Replies
5
Views
2K
Is Asymmetry Momentum Transfer a Viable Concept for Space Propulsion?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Regarding momentum transfer, couple questions.
Replies
4
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top