What is the physical or statistical meaning of this integral

jam_27
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
What is the physical or statistical meaning of the following integral

\int^{a}_{o} g(\vartheta) d(\vartheta) = \int^{\infty}_{a} g(\vartheta) d(\vartheta)

where g(\vartheta) is a Gaussian in \vartheta describing the transition frequency fluctuation in a gaseous system (assume two-level and inhomogeneous) .

\vartheta = \omega_{0} -\omega, where \omega_{0} is the peak frequency and \omega the running frequency.

I can see that the integral finds a point \vartheta = a for which the area under the curve (the Gaussian) between 0 to a and a to \infty are equal.

But is there a statistical meaning to this integral? Does it find something like the most-probable value \vartheta = a? But the most probable value should be \vartheta = 0 in my understanding! So what does the point \vartheta = a tell us?

I will be grateful if somebody can explain this and/or direct me to a reference.

Cheers

Jamy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jam_27 said:
\int^{a}_{o} g(\vartheta) d(\vartheta) = \int^{\infty}_{a} g(\vartheta) d(\vartheta)

But is there a statistical meaning to this integral?

Hi Jamy! :smile:

It's the 50% likelihood range …

50% likely that the result will be between ±a

(and it works for any symmetric probability distribution, not just Gaussian :wink:)
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi Jamy! :smile:

It's the 50% likelihood range …

50% likely that the result will be between ±a

(and it works for any symmetric probability distribution, not just Gaussian :wink:)

Thanks a ton for the reply. Could you please provide a reference/book. I want to see how its 50% likely.
Cheers
Jamy:smile:
 
Well I suppose the domain is on positive values. For it to be a probability distribution its norm should be unity.

\int^{\infty}_{o} g(\vartheta) d(\vartheta) = 1

The 50% follows from 11th grade math, by the rules of how to add integrals over different intervals.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top