Schools University of Toronto or Waterloo?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PE2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    University
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around choosing between University of Toronto (UofT) and University of Waterloo for programs in Engineering Science, Physics, or Nanotechnology Engineering. Concerns are raised about UofT's physics and mathematics programs potentially leading to lower GPAs, while some argue that the university's reputation does not significantly impact undergraduate physics education. There are mixed opinions on the strength of Waterloo's physics programs compared to UofT and others, with some participants noting a preference for broader science exposure in engineering programs. The desire for a deep theoretical understanding is emphasized, along with worries about the focus of engineering courses on practical applications over theory. Overall, participants seek insights from current students to make an informed decision.
PE2
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am in my final year of High School in Ontario (Canada), and I must soon choose which University program to attend in September.

The following programs are what I am trying to decide between:

- Engineering Science (University of Toronto)
- Physics (University of Toronto) [or Mathematics and Physics]
- Nanotechnology Engineering (University of Waterloo)
- http://www.science.uwaterloo.ca/programs/math_phys.html (University of Waterloo)

I have already looked into the programs quite a bit and found that all of them provide the option of pursuing physics in graduate school (given I choose the physics option in Engineering Science, or in Nanotechnology Engineering). What I am concerned about is the level of preparation that each program provides.

I have read some posts by a member called vincebs, and he seems to be strongly against the physics/mathematics and physics programs at UofT because they apparently keep the students' GPAs very low.

On the other hand, some people say that Waterloo's physics programs are not very strong compared to Universities like UofT, McGill, or Queen's.

And then, many others say that where one studies physics at the undergraduate level does not matter at all. This would imply that performance on the http://www.cap.ca/edu/puniprzex.html says more about the kind of students that attend a University, rather than the quality of the education at that University (UofT students often perform well in this exam, whereas Waterloo students rarely place very high).

The engineering programs at both Universities are attractive in that they both seem to provide a great deal of breadth, but I am worried that if I choose to pursue physics through a BASc degree then I would be at a disadvantage due to the lesser focus on theory in engineering math and science courses. I have read that many students have switched from engineering to science for this reason.

Overall, what would you people recommend? I am interested in learning theory, since I like to have a deep understanding of how things work and why they work in that way (this applies to both math and science concepts), but I am also interested in studying a wider range of sciences which engineering programs seem to offer, and possibly science programs with enough electives.

I know there are members here who are currently enrolled in the programs I am trying to choose between - input from them would be very helpful.

Thank you, and sorry for the length.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm in the same boat. Though I'm deciding between Physics or Math and Physics at UofT. Maybe EngSci? I'm kinda stuck at UofT now since I already payed my 1st month's rent!

The only other program I applied for the Waterloo Physics. Though I heard they have a messy physics department. That shouldn't be a problem for you since Mathematical Physics is under the Math department.

Vincebs is scaring me!

PE2 are you going to UofT next weekend?
 
Bright Wang said:
The only other program I applied for the Waterloo Physics. Though I heard they have a messy physics department. That shouldn't be a problem for you since Mathematical Physics is under the Math department.
Well, there are actually two Mathematical Physics programs at Waterloo; one of them is in the science faculty, and the other in the math faculty. They differ very slightly, and overall the programs span over both faculties anyway.

And can you elaborate on what you've heard of the physics department being "messy"?

Vincebs is scaring me!
Me too. Coupled with the other failure stories I've heard coming from UofT, I have been left slightly hesitant of going there.

PE2 are you going to UofT next weekend?
What's happening? Regardless, it's a fairly long distance for me, and visiting UofT and UW during the March break open house events gave me a pretty good overview of the Universities.
 
Hi PE2. I just heard its messy, haha. I don't have a clue what that means. I just heard the math department is a lot better than the physics department. I don't know the details.

Oh next weekend is the POPTOR weekend. I just though your in Ontario and doing physics so you might go.

Oh and check out "Physics Universities in Canada: Specifics" if you haven't.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top