What is the relationship between h and R in this circular motion problem?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a skier sliding down a frictionless hemispherical dome and determining the height h at which the normal force becomes zero in relation to the radius R of the dome. The discussion centers around concepts of circular motion, forces, and energy conservation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using conservation of energy and centripetal acceleration to relate height h and radius R. Some express confusion about the application of forces and the free body diagram, while others suggest drawing diagrams to clarify the forces acting on the skier.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing hints and suggestions for approaching the problem. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the forces involved, particularly concerning the normal force and its relationship to centripetal acceleration. Some participants have made progress in their reasoning, while others are still seeking clarity on specific concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through the complexities of free body diagrams and the dynamics of circular motion, with some expressing uncertainty about the assumptions made in their calculations.

Almond
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
A skier starts from rest at the top of a frictionless slope of ice in the shape of a hemispherical dome with radius R and slides down the slope. At a certain height h, the normal force becomes zero and the skier leaves the surface of the ice. What is h in term of R?

I know the answer is 2R/3, but couldn't figure out how to get there.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Show what you've done so far and where you are stuck.

Hint: Consider the forces acting on the skier at any point and apply Newton's 2nd law.
 
Welcome to PF!

Hi Almond ! Welcome to PF! :smile:
Almond said:
… At a certain height h, the normal force becomes zero

Hint: centripetal acceleration :wink:
 
Well, I tried to use conservation of energy,
mgR=mgh+1/2mv2
Then I used centripetal acceleration, a=V2 /R
gR=gh+1/2aR,

And I'm stuck, not sure how to get a.
 
ok, now draw a diagram (for yourself) and call the angle θ …

what is the normal force when the skier is at angle θ from the vertical? :smile:
 
another hint:

Draw a free body diagram of the skier as he leaves the slope. What is the normal force at that point? what are the sum of the forces in the direction of the normal force? The skier "drops" from R to h, is there an equation of motion that relates velocity as a function of position? The geometry of the skier as he leaves the slope in terms of R and h will be helpful.
 
I have managed to get the answer somehow by using these two equations:

h=Rsin[tex]\theta[/tex] and
a=gsin[tex]\theta[/tex]

But I don't understand the second equation, shouldn't it be g=asin[tex]\theta[/tex], since mg points downwards and is the component of centripetal force, I suppose? I am totally confused with the free body diagram.:frown:

Thanks for all the help so far!:smile:
 
Almond said:
But I don't understand the second equation, shouldn't it be g=asin[tex]\theta[/tex], since mg points downwards and is the component of centripetal force, I suppose? I am totally confused with the free body diagram.
If mg points down, what is its radial component?

Draw a diagram at the moment that the skier just begins to lose contact with the surface. What forces act? What are their components? What net force acts toward the center of the sphere?
 
Last edited:
An approach that helped me solve this problem was drawing a free body diagram for the skier, from the point of view of his accelerated system and look at all the forces he has acting upon him. From there, just look at the specific instant where N=0 and find the correlating angle Θ from the vertical.
 
  • #10
I agree with RoyalCat. Whenever I come across a problem involving centripetal acceleration, I always pretend there's a centrifugal force acting on the accelerated body. It makes so much more sense for me.
 
  • #11
and I could never work my way with centrifugal force.. always wondered, "where is this coming from!?"
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K