The Difference Between a Few Terms

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jilvin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference Terms
Jilvin
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
WARNING: THIS POST WAS WRITTEN BY A PERSON WHO IS A NOOB AT PHYSICS.


Can somebody compare and contrast what people mean when they say the following terms?

1. Quantum Mechanics
2. Quantum Field Theory
3. Quantum Electrodynamics
4. Quantum Chromodynamics

Any helpful posts would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, it's hard to give a really good explanation to someone who has very little physics experience... but basically:

1. Quantum mechanics is a theory that describes how very very small particles (smaller than atoms) behave. Actually, that's misleading: it describes how all objects behave, even large ones, but for large objects we have other, simpler theories that are pretty close. It's only when you get to very small systems that those simpler theories are inadequate.
2. Quantum field theory is, in a sense, a more general version of quantum mechanics that tries to also describe particles that are moving very fast. Basically it enhances ordinary quantum mechanics so that it's compatible with Einstein's theory of special relativity. It relies of the concept of a "field" which is some quantity that has a value at every point in space. (If you've ever heard of an electric field or magnetic field, those are examples)
3. Quantum electrodynamics is a particular kind of quantum field theory that describes the electromagnetic force.
4. Quantum chromodynamics is another particular kind of quantum field theory that describes the strong force, a.k.a. "color force" (hence the name).
 
I wouldn't say that QFT is a more general version of QM. I prefer to call all that stuff about wavefuctions and the Schrödinger equation "wave mechanics". If you call that QM, then QFT can be though of as a generalization. (That's probably what you meant by "in a sense"). Wave mechanics is a theory of a single particle. In QFTs, interactions can change the number of particles. To me QM is the idea that the states of a physical system can be represented mathematically by the 1-dimensional subspaces of a complex separable Hilbert space. I would have been tempted to answer 1 exactly like that, but this answer probably doesn't make any sense to someone who describes himself as a "noob", so your answer is more appropriate.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top