Question about distant galaxies

  • Thread starter Thread starter Heuristix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Galaxies
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the observation of distant galaxies and how their light informs us about the early universe. It highlights the confusion regarding the distance of these galaxies when the light was emitted versus their current distance due to the universe's expansion. While the light from these galaxies has traveled for over 13 billion years, they were indeed much closer at the time the light was emitted. The expansion of the universe means that galaxies are now significantly farther away than they were when the light began its journey. This illustrates the complexities of cosmic distances and the implications of an expanding universe on our understanding of astronomical observations.
Heuristix
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
It is often stated that observation of the most distant stars inform us about the early universe because the light we observe now was emitted from the stars when the universe was young. In fact this is a quote from space.com:

"The universe is about 13.7 billion years old. Light reaching us from the earliest known galaxies has been travelling, therefore, for more than 13 billion years."

I, as a lay person, am puzzled by this because I would have expected those stars to have been much closer to us when the universe was young (than they are now) and only moved away with the expansion of the universe. So in the example above, why did it take light 13 billion years to get to earth? Would not those stars have been much closer to us when the light was emitted?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The galaxies were closer then than they are now, yes. The quote doesn't say either how close they were then nor how far they are now.

Since the universe is expanding, though the light traveled 13 billion light years, the galaxies would have been closer than 13 billion light years when the light was emitted. And at the same time, they would be much further than that now.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'

Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'

Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
View full post »

Thread 'Do electron density waves accompany EM waves in coaxial cables?'

Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
View full post »
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'

Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'

The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Question regarding light from distant objects
Replies
8
Views
2K
I How fast were distant galaxies moving?
Replies
7
Views
2K
B How did Earth get so far away from other galaxies?
Replies
12
Views
2K
I How do you get to the conclusion that there is accelerating expansion?
Replies
23
Views
2K
B What value of z (redshift) equals apparent superluminal recession?
Replies
28
Views
3K
I Questions about the Location of the Big Bang and the Age of the Universe
Replies
8
Views
3K
B Distance of Stars / Size of the Universe calculation
Replies
6
Views
3K
B Does the age of the Universe differ for observers in expanding space?
Replies
19
Views
2K
B Clarification on how old the Universe is
Replies
11
Views
3K
I Why on Earth do we not see older stars close to us?
Replies
3
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top