Bivectors, Cartan Geometry and Curvature

Orbb
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
I have some questions related to bivector space, the curvature tensor and Cartan geometry.

1) Because of its antisymmetric properties

R_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}=-R_{\nu\mu\alpha\beta}, R_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}=-R_{\mu\nu\beta\alpha},

the Riemann curvature tensor can be regarded as a second-rank bivector R_{AB} in six-dimensional space (in case of spacetime dimension four). Due to the symmetry

R_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}=R_{\alpha\beta\mu\nu},

one can also conclude that R_{AB}=R_{BA}. My question now is, which of the symmetry properties remain when extending Riemannian geometry to Cartan geometry with a non-symmetric Ricci-Tensor? Is it correct that one can still obtain a bitensor R_{AB}, which then however is non-symmetric?

2) The six-dimensional space is of signature (+++---). Is there any analogue to Lorentz transformations in this space?

3) The metric g_{AB} in bivector space can be constructed by

g_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma} = g_{\mu\rho}g_{\nu\sigma}-g_{\mu\sigma}g_{\nu\rho}.

I guess from that one can derive a curvature tensor R_{ABCD} for the six-dimensional space. Is that correct? And is there any interpretation for the bitensor representation R_{AB} of R_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}?

Any answers highly appreciated!

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry, but the link doesn't work. If further elaboration on the questions is of help, or if my understanding is flawed, please tell. You're also welcome to point me to resources dealing with these topics. I couldn't find anything on these questions though.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top