Hartle's Gravity: Read it Before Special Relativity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Goldbeetle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
AI Thread Summary
Reading Hartle's book on general relativity is best approached after gaining a solid understanding of special relativity (SR). While Hartle does cover SR, prior exposure is essential for grasping concepts effectively, particularly the manipulation of Lorentz factors and the 4-vector formulation. The discussion highlights the recommendation of starting with "Spacetime Physics," especially the first edition, as a foundational text. Additionally, "A Traveller's Guide to Spacetime" is noted as an excellent resource, alongside "Spacetime Physics" and a book by French, indicating a preference for texts that provide exercises and solutions to reinforce learning.
Goldbeetle
Messages
210
Reaction score
1
Has anybody read the book? Is it just me or it would be better to read before a book on special relativity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, I'd suggest a book on special relativity before tackling Hartle, though Hartle does cover SR. If you're finding that section of his book difficult, I'd suggest, as usual, the red paperback first edition of Spacetime Physics.
 
You should definitely have had some exposure to SR before going through Hartle's Gravity. Even exposure on the level of simply manipulating lorentz factors and whatnot is very helpful before presented with the 4-vector formulation of everything. The book is, after all, an introduction to general relativity, and just quickly glosses over stuff from SR as a refresher/analogy to GR.
 
Thanks. I'm reading "A Traveller's Guide to Spacetime" and it's excellent. I also have "Spacetime Physics" (first red paperback edition with exercises and solutions" and the book by French.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top