Voltages in Photoelectric Circuits

AI Thread Summary
In photoelectric circuits, when the frequency of incident light exceeds the threshold frequency, electrons are ejected with increased kinetic energy, but the circuit's voltage and current remain constant. The stopping voltage, which is necessary to halt these ejected electrons, increases with higher photon frequency, leading to higher kinetic energy. Current is determined by the number of photons hitting the photocathode, not the speed of individual electrons. The application of Ohm's law (V=IR) does not apply in this context, causing confusion about the relationship between voltage, current, and electron speed. Understanding these distinctions clarifies the behavior of photoelectric circuits.
MrOriginal
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
In the photoelectric effect, if you have a frequency above the threshold frequency, electrons are ejected with greater kinetic energy, but the voltage and current of a circuit using the photoelectric effect is the same. If electrons have a greater Ek, they would have a greater speed, and so if they begin traveling through the circuit’s wire with a greater speed, more electrons would be traveling through per second, so current would be higher, and so would voltage; V= IR. But, as above, this is not the case. Is this because all the additional kinetic energy is used up when the electrons enter the wire?

Then again, if they did enter with more energy, the extent of the conversion of potential energy to kinetic through the wire would still be the same as with electrons of lower kinetic energy, so voltage should be the same. However this conflicts with the idea that the electrons travel faster, leading to a higher current and voltage.

I am quite confused. Please help :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MrOriginal said:
I am quite confused.
You are.
MrOriginal said:
... but the voltage and current of a circuit using the photoelectric effect is the same.
The same as what? What voltage are you talking about? The relevant voltage in the photoelectric effect is the stopping voltage ##V_s## that is required to stop the ejected photoelectrons to reach the anode. A higher frequency of incident photons means higher kinetic energy of ejected electrons which in turn means higher stopping voltage. The current is related to the number of photons per unit time incident on the photocathode; a higher number of incident photons means a higher number of ejected photoelectrons and, therefore, a higher current.

MrOriginal said:
... so current would be higher, and so would voltage; V= IR.
A photocell does not obey Ohm's law. V = IR is inapplicable here. That's what cuases your confusion.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top