How Are Irreducible Representations of O(3) and SO(3) Derived from SU(2)?

Rory9
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How can irreducible representations of O(3) and SO(3) be determined from the irreducible representations of SU(2)?

The Attempt at a Solution



I believe there is a two-one homomorphic mapping from SU(2) to SO(3); is that enough for some shared representations? If I had an idea of *why* irreducible reps. can determined for O(3) and SO(3) from SU(2), I might have a better notion of *how* to go about proving it.

Cheers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mathematically, what is a representation of a group G?
 
George Jones said:
Mathematically, what is a representation of a group G?

Typically a matrix, I believe, for which \Gamma(T_{1}T_{2}) = \Gamma(T_{1})\Gamma(T_{2}) holds, where T_{1}, T_{2} belong to G
 
There are 2 isomorphisms you need to use:

\mbox{SO(3)}\simeq\frac{\mbox{SU(2)}}{\mathbb{Z}_{2}}

and

\mbox{O(3)} = \mbox{SO(3)} \times \{-1_{3\times 3}, 1_{3\times 3} \}

There are at least 50 books or so discussing the connection b/w SO(3) and SU(2), however there are many less computing all representations of O(3) starting from the ones of SO(3) deducted from the ones of SU(2).
 
Last edited:
bigubau said:
There are 2 isomorphisms you need to use:

\mbox{SO(3)}\simeq\frac{\mbox{SU(2)}}{\mathbb{Z}_{2}}

and

\mbox{O(3)} = \mbox{SO(3)} \times \{-1_{3\times 3}, 1_{3\times 3} \}

There are at least 50 books or so discussing the connection b/w SO(3) and SU(2), however there are many less computing all representations of O(3) starting from the ones of SO(3) deducted from the ones of SU(2).


Thank you very much for your answer. I understand the second statement, but what exactly are you doing in the first - simply slicing off the complex aspect by mathematical fiat?

Cheers :)
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top