Is Logic Really Based on Mathematics? A Question for Scientists

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alexx.
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between logic and mathematics, with some participants arguing that logic is not fundamentally based on mathematics. One contributor, identifying as a mathematician, asserts that while a form of logic can be constructed using mathematics, it is not necessary for all sciences to rely on mathematical foundations. They emphasize that mathematics is actually derived from logical principles rather than the other way around. The conversation highlights the complexity of defining the connections between logic, mathematics, and science. Ultimately, the debate reflects differing views on the foundational roles of logic and mathematics in scientific inquiry.
Alexx.
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Lately I've been through a matter that seemed quite ridiculous at the beginning.
I believe I'm aware of what both Logic and Mathematics are. But I've come across people defending that Logic is not based on Mathematics, and as well that all Sciences need to be based on Mathematics or either they are not Science.
Science is the language of nature, so I'm sure everything is either directly or indirectly based on Mathematics. But I'm lost as to how to explain people that Logic IS indeed based on it, more than indirectly; A Mathematical reasoning is not only using numbers to think, and to live, is it?
I might however be also wrong, but until now I do keep my arguements.
So, if somebody thinks so as well, I ask to aid me on said matter. Explaining how everything, and more specifically Logic is based on Mathematics, that is.
Beforehand, thanks everyone in the Physics Forums.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Frankly I can't make heads or tails out of this.

You state: "But I've come across people defending that Logic is not based on Mathematics, and as well that all Sciences need to be based on Mathematics or either they are not Science."

Well, I'm one of those people and I am a mathematician!

You can set up a form of "logic" that is based on mathematics, or you can set up a different basis for logic and then base mathematics on that- it's all a matter of "style".

Science doesn't have to be "based" on mathematics- although, certainly, mathematics makes it easier to write clear, precise, statements.
 
Of course logic is not based on mathematics. You have it backwards. Mathematics is based on logic.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top