Ray matrix - refraction at a curved surface

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the refraction matrix at a curved convex surface with radius of curvature R, separating two media with refractive indices n1 and n2. The correct refraction matrix is established as \left[\stackrel{1}{\frac{1}{R}\left(\frac{n_1}{n_2}-1\right)}\stackrel{0}{\frac{n_1}{n_2}}\right]. Participants emphasize the importance of using the refraction equation {r_t2}={R_2}{r_i2} and the transfer matrix \left[\stackrel{1}{\frac{d_2_1}{n_t_1}}\stackrel{0}{1}\right] in the derivation process. The discussion highlights the need for careful computation at the interface due to the angle of incidence.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of refraction principles and equations
  • Familiarity with matrix representation of optical systems
  • Knowledge of curved surface geometry and radius of curvature
  • Proficiency in approximations involving Taylor series, specifically \sqrt{1-{x^2}}{\approx}1-\frac{x^2}{2}
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the refraction matrix for different geometries
  • Explore the application of transfer matrices in optical systems
  • Learn about the implications of curvature on light propagation
  • Investigate the use of Taylor series in optical physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in optics, physicists working with light refraction, and anyone involved in the design of optical systems that utilize curved surfaces.

8614smith
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The diagram shows a curved convex surface with radius of curvature R separating two media with differing refractive indices of n_{1} and n_{2}
raymatrix.jpg

Show that the matrix representing refraction at this surface is \left[\stackrel{1}{\frac{1}{R}\left(\frac{n_1}{n_2}-1\right)}\stackrel{0}{\frac{n_1}{n_2}}\right]

In your derivation you may assume that \sqrt{1-{x^2}}{\approx}1-\frac{x^2}{2} and that the slope of a curved surface \theta_s may be approximated by \theta_{s}{\approx}\frac{dx}{dy}

Homework Equations



refraction matrix: {r_t2}={R_2}{r_i2} where {R_2}=\left[\stackrel{1}{0}\stackrel{-D_2}{1}\right] and {D_2}=\frac{{n_t2}-{n_i2}}{R_2}

Transfer matrix: \left[\stackrel{1}{\frac{d_2_1}{n_t_1}}\stackrel{0}{1}\right]

The Attempt at a Solution


using the refraction equation i have got to \left[\stackrel{1}{0}\stackrel{-\frac{{n_2}-{n_1}}{R}}{1}\right] and using the transfer matrix i got \left[\stackrel{1}{\frac{R}{2n_2}}\stackrel{0}{1}\right]

I'm not too sure what to do from here, I've multiplied them both by each other both ways round and neither way got the right answer, I am unsure even whether this is the right way to do it.

i assume that the aprroximation it gives has something to do with the equation of a circle but i don't know how to use it...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You will have to use the refraction equation, but you need to be careful when computing the refraction at the interface since the interface is at an angle. So it is dependent on y_1, assuming y is your interface axis.

Also since it is an interface, you know y_1=y_2 so the top of the matrix is (1 0). The bottom of the matrix will take some work.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K