Potential ground and electric charge

AI Thread Summary
In electronics, ground is typically defined as having a potential of zero, treating the Earth as a large conductor. However, there is debate regarding the Earth's net electric charge, with some arguing it has no net charge and is instead surrounded by charged regions like the Van Allen Belts. The key property of ground is its ability to maintain a stable potential regardless of current flow, rather than its resistance. This stability allows for the practical designation of ground potential as zero in electronic circuits. The discussion highlights the complexities of grounding in relation to the Earth's electrical properties.
sami23
Messages
69
Reaction score
1
In electronics it is customary to define the potential of ground (thinking of the Earth as a large conductor) as zero. Is this consistent with the fact that the Earth has a net electric charge that is not zero?
 
  • Like
Likes spicytea
Physics news on Phys.org
sami23 said:
the Earth has a net electric charge that is not zero
Really? Do you have a reference for what the net charge on the Earth is?
 
In electronics it is customary to define the potential of ground (thinking of the Earth as a large conductor) as zero. Is this consistent with the fact that the Earth has a net electric charge that is not zero?

I don't think either of these statements are correct.

The Earth is not a large conductor.
The Earth has no net charge itself , although it is surrounded by a charged 'halo' known as the Van Allen Belts.

The fundamental (electrical/electronic) property of an Earth or ground is that it does not change potential for any current flow within the normal circuit parameters, not that it has low or high resistance.
It is this property that allows the benchmark potenttial to be declared 'zero' in electronics.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top