I have some trouble with the fourth spatial dimension

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TubbaBlubba
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimension
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conceptual understanding of the 3-sphere, particularly its properties and implications in higher-dimensional spaces. The 3-sphere is defined algebraically as the set of all points (x, y, z, w) satisfying the equation x² + y² + z² + w² = 1. Key properties include its compactness, lack of boundary, and the ability to shrink loops to a point, distinguishing it from a torus. The conversation also touches on analogies with lower-dimensional spheres to aid comprehension.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic geometry and topology concepts
  • Familiarity with algebraic equations and their geometric interpretations
  • Knowledge of dimensionality in mathematics
  • Conceptual grasp of tesseracts and Klein bottles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the 3-sphere in topology
  • Explore the implications of the Poincaré conjecture in three-dimensional spaces
  • Learn about the construction and properties of tesseracts
  • Investigate the relationship between lower-dimensional spheres and their higher-dimensional counterparts
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of topology, and anyone interested in higher-dimensional geometry and its properties.

TubbaBlubba
I suppose it might be appropriate here. I'm not really looking for an answer in pure maths (Topology is waaaaaaaaaaay beyond me), but rather in concept.

Now, I can appreciate the properties of a tesseract, how it relates to and derives from the cube (I think of it as either putting 8 cubes together, or "pushing" the vertices of a cube into a fourth dimension), at least from a projective view.

I also have a "feeling" for the properties of a Klein bottle and I can accept the way it's constructed.

However, I've been wrestling about the thoughts of a spatially "enclosed" universe for a while. I've been thinking about a 2-d world on a sphere (which would have no way out, but never encounter a border).

Logically, one would move on to the 3-sphere (I think that's what it called?) but I can't quite grasp the concept or implications of it. All projections of it that I've seen simply seem to be an infinite amount of rings superimposed into a torus of some sort? Can anyone attempt to explain what the 3-sphere is trying to imply and what "properties" it would have?

This is purely out of recreation and curiosity on my part, I'm unlikely to ever come in touch with mathemathics of this sort. Regardless, I have a bit of a keen interest in it. While I might not have a good knowledge of the relevant mathemathics, I can PROBABLY wrap my head around the concepts required to it.

I hope someone will make an attempt to enlighten this uneducated lad.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One way to get a grip on the 3-sphere is to consider analogies with lower dimensional spheres (a regular 2-dimensional sphere and circle). If you consider a sphere and intersect it with a plane (a 2-dimensional infinite and flat surface in 3-space), you will get circles. If you take the 3-sphere and intersect it with a hyperplane in 4-space (a 3-dimensional infinite flat "surface" in 4-space) you will get spheres. Algebraically, the 3 sphere is the set of all numbers (x,y,z,w) that satisfy x^2+y^2+z^2+w^2 = 1.

Of all the possible 3-dimensional spaces, the 3-sphere has some very nice properties. First of all, it is compact which basically means it is finite in size. Like you mentioned, it has no boundary. It also has the property that if you have a loop in it you can shrink it to a point (this is also happens on the regular sphere but doesn't happen on a torus since you can take a loop that goes around the hole). It was actually shown a few years ago that this is the only 3 dimensional space that has these properties (this is the Poincare conjecture).
 
Thanks a lot! I looked a bit more into it, and I think I can get a bit of a grip on it with the analogy of orthagonally superimposing two 2-spheres in a 4-dimensional room.

Definitely an interesting object.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
11K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K