Average electronic momentum in bound state: please see this

ani4physics
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Someone please tell me if I am thinking right:

Let's consider an unperturbed electronic state of an atom/molecule. If we denote it by [a>, then the average electronic momentum in state [a> is,

<p> = <a]p[a> = (<a]p<a])* (because p is hermitian)
= (<a]*p*[a>*)
= (<a]p*[a>) (because [a> is real.)
= - (<a]p[a>) ( because p is purely imaginary. so p* = -p)
so, <p> = 0

so, the average momentum in any unperturbed eigenstate = 0

Now, the atom/molecule is being perturbed by a time-dependent scalar potential of the form V(t) = V Cos(wt). So we can write the time-dependent wave function as a perturbation series. Since there is no magnetic field, the wave function will be real and <p> = 0.

Is it true? Please correct me if I am doing it wrong. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ani4physics said:
<p> = <a]p[a> = (<a]p<a])* (because p is hermitian)
not quite
(<a|p <a|)* is nonsensical.
you could do <a| (p |a>) = <a| (<a| p^dagger)^dagger = <a| (<a| p)^dagger
or (<a|p ) |a> = (p^dagger |a>)^dagger |a> = (p |a>)^dagger |a>.

ani4physics said:
= (<a]*p*[a>*)
= (<a]p*[a>) (because [a> is real.)
what do you mean |a> is real? |a> is a STATE, not a number.

----
here's what i think you mean.

notice p is a hermitian operator so that for any state |a> we have
(<a|p|a>)* = <a|p|a>^dagger = <a| p^dagger |a> = <a|p|a>.

suppose |a> is a state such that <x|a> = a(x) is a real valued function.
[i.e. the wave-function is real (in the x - representation)]

then <a|p|a>= -i \hbar \int d^3x ( a^*(x) \nabla a(x) ) = -i \hbar \int d^3x ( a(x) \nabla a(x) )
first equality is definition, and second is assumption that a(x) is real valued.

since the integral of a real valued function (a a') is real, we have
(<a|p|a>)* = - (<a|p|a>).

so that <a|p|a> = 0.
-------

ani4physics said:
Now, the atom/molecule is being perturbed by a time-dependent scalar potential of the form V(t) = V Cos(wt). So we can write the time-dependent wave function as a perturbation series. Since there is no magnetic field, the wave function will be real and <p> = 0.

this doesn't follow. What makes you think the time-dependent wave function
will be real? what does the perturbation series have to do with anything?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top