Deriving the De Broglie Wavelength

Strafespar
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
E=mc^2 and E=hf. In Special Relativity, how can y=h/p be derived from E=hf?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Strafespar said:
E=mc^2 and E=hf. In Special Relativity, how can y=h/p be derived from E=hf?

E2(p) = m2 c4 + p2 c2 [energy in the reference frame with momentum p]

E(p)=h/T(p) [T(p) is the time periodicity in the reference frame p ]

m c2 = E(0) [the mass is the energy in the rest frame p=0]

m c2 = h/T(0) [T(0) is the time periodicity in the reference frame p=0]

by putting all things together you find:

1/T2(p) = 1/T2(0) + c2/y2(p) [from the relativistic dispersion relation]

where y(p)= h / p [is the induced spatial periodicity in the reference frame with momentum p].

See http://arxiv.org/abs/0903.3680" "Compact time and determinism: foundations"

Then if you impose the above periodicities as constraints to a string (field in compact space-time, similarly to the harmonic frequency spectrum of a vibrating string with fixed ends) you obtain the following energy quantization

E2n(p) = n2 E2(p) = n2( M2 c4 + p2 c2)

which is actually the energy quantization coming from the usual field theory with second quantization, after normal ordering. In arXiv:0903.3680 it is shown that this procedure provides an exact matching with ordinary quantum field theory, including Path integral and the commutation relations.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This post is a spin-off of the original post that discussed Barandes theory, A new realistic stochastic interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, for any details about the interpretation in general PLEASE look up for an answer there. Now I want this post to focus on this pre-print: J. A. Barandes, "New Prospects for a Causally Local Formulation of Quantum Theory", arXiv 2402.16935 (2024) My main concerns are that Barandes thinks this deflates the anti-classical Bell's theorem. In Barandes...
I understand that the world of interpretations of quantum mechanics is very complex, as experimental data hasn't completely falsified the main deterministic interpretations (such as Everett), vs non-deterministc ones, however, I read in online sources that Objective Collapse theories are being increasingly challenged. Does this mean that deterministic interpretations are more likely to be true? I always understood that the "collapse" or "measurement problem" was how we phrased the fact that...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Back
Top