Is the Quantum Integrity Postulate on LinuxQuestions.org Accurate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter miraiw
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a post on LinuxQuestions.org regarding quantum computing, where the original poster expresses confusion over the author's mathematical claims and terminology, particularly the concepts of a "quantum power supply" and "internal data cables." There is skepticism about the validity of these ideas, suggesting they may be fabricated solutions to the quantum decoherence problem. The poster seeks clarification and verification of these concepts, noting the difficulty in testing the proposed hypothesis. For those interested in understanding quantum computing, a recommendation is made to refer to the Wikipedia page on quantum computers for a clearer overview of the subject, including the distinction between classical bits and quantum bits.
miraiw
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
So, I'm reading http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/blog/kenny_strawn-513767/about-quantum-computing-the-quantum-integrity-postulate-3169/" on LinuxQuestion.org, and I run across a post on quantum computing. Naturally, I take a look. When I finish reading it I'm like, "wuah?" because his math seems off.
Can anyone explain/verify what this guy said?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Technology news on Phys.org
I'm curious what he means by a quantum power supply and internal data cables (as well as the rest of the things he lists). Sounds like a load of rubbish he just made up as his own 'solution' to the quantum decoherence problem (unless someone can tell me otherwise).

Not entirely sure how you would test this hypothesis either.

If you want to know about quantum computing, your best start will be here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_computer
It will give you a good overview and has a far better description of bits vs. quantum bits.

Jared
 
Thread 'Is this public key encryption?'

Thread 'Is this public key encryption?'

I've tried to intuit public key encryption but never quite managed. But this seems to wrap it up in a bow. This seems to be a very elegant way of transmitting a message publicly that only the sender and receiver can decipher. Is this how PKE works? No, it cant be. In the above case, the requester knows the target's "secret" key - because they have his ID, and therefore knows his birthdate.
View full post »

Similar threads

I Schrödinger's astronaut as a quantum computer?
Replies
27
Views
2K
I What do the authors of the paper mean here exactly by path integral?
Replies
6
Views
2K
I Will quantum computation lower energy requirements?
Replies
4
Views
7K
B Understanding the Intricacies of Quantum Computers and Their Limitations
Replies
8
Views
2K
What are the best books for learning Quantum Computing?
Replies
4
Views
6K
Admissions Safety School Programs for a Physics PhD
Replies
4
Views
4K
I What does ## \psi^{*}\hat{H}\psi ## mean?
Replies
9
Views
3K
A Shahar Hod's bound on the fine-structure constant
Replies
10
Views
3K
I Compatibility of Quantum Mechanics and Special Relativity
Replies
43
Views
5K
What Math to learn for Cosmology?
Replies
9
Views
5K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top