How does the concept of wave functions apply to large objects?

Ty1erC
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Let me preface this by saying I am no physicist. This is a hobby of mine, and I'm trying to piece together knowledge as pick it up from different sources.

I understand the particle/wave duality of particles like electrons (at least I think so). I cannot grasp, however, the leap in thinking that associates ALL objects (like people) with wave functions. Can someone enlighten me on this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Everything has a wavelength but the larger the object the smaller the wavelength so it's only noticeable for pretty small things - like electrons or photons.

There is a great series of books by the famous physicist George Gamov, the Mr Tompkins books, one of which describes what would happen if Planks constant (the number that sets the size of this effect) were larger. Elephants would just be a little but fussy around the edges but a mosquito would be spread of a cubic mile and impossible to swat. tigers running though a forest would be diffracted and come out at different angles.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top