Understanding the Reference Point for EMG Out Voltage

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the reference point for the output voltage of EMG sensors used in a prosthetic arm project. Participants explore the implications of referencing the output signal to different ground points, including circuit ground, body ground, and a mid-point voltage created by a buffer circuit. The conversation includes technical considerations related to signal conditioning and filtering.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the EMG output voltage is referenced to circuit ground instead of body ground or the 2.5V mid-point voltage from the buffer circuit.
  • Another participant clarifies that the output signal is measured against the power supply ground, which serves as the common point for the Arduino input.
  • Concerns are raised about potential safety issues due to the voltage across the body being measured.
  • A participant references a data sheet for a low power instrument amplifier, suggesting that a split supply configuration could be relevant to the discussion.
  • There is a suggestion that the output voltage should be referenced to a specific pin on the AD620 amplifier, with some agreement on this point from other participants.
  • Discussion includes the differences between the Arduino circuit using a single supply and the datasheet circuit using a split supply, highlighting how these configurations affect the output signal reference.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriate reference point for the EMG output voltage, with no consensus reached on the best approach. Some agree on the referencing to pin 5 of the AD620, while others emphasize the implications of using circuit ground versus body ground.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects various assumptions about circuit configurations and the implications of referencing output signals, which may depend on specific applications and safety considerations. Unresolved aspects include the potential risks associated with measuring voltages across the body.

hisham.i
Messages
176
Reaction score
2
Hello..
Am working for my FYP concerning prosthetic arm, so i have to take data from EMG sensors which are on the surface of the body.
The first step of my project is signal conditioning and filtering, so i was searching for circuits concerning signal conditioning and i got the circuit in the following link:
http://biomed.engsoc.org/system/files/images/EMG_Arduino.png

At the write of the figuire they said that :"EMG out voltage is referenced with respect to GND"...My question concerns this point.

What should be the reference point of the out signal!, why its not the body ground, or the 2.5v which is created using the buffer circuit?

Thanks for help
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
The output signal at "EMG out" is 0-5v measured against the circuit, or power supply, ground. That's what the "...referenced..." message is trying to convey. Since the PS ground is the common point for the Arduino input, this is how it should be. I didn't look up the opamps specs so I'm not sure what all those extra pins are doing.

The "Muscle Input" are a differential signal from two electrodes attached, I suppose, to your skin someplace. And it looks like the "Body Ground" pin/signal is also meant to go some place on the skin and provide a mid-point reference. I would guess that without the Body Ground you would get a lot of garbage noise on the actual inputs. You might be able to get a similar signal reference by just using the circuit ground as Body Ground.

But in either case there may be "potential" across the body being measured which could be dangerous. For safety's sake I would want to read more about the circuit before deploying it on anyone but myself...
 
Have you looked at this low power instrument amps data sheet?

http://www.analog.com/static/imported-files/data_sheets/AD620.pdf"

They have a typical ECG application circuit which uses a split supply (±3volts).

attachment.php?attachmentid=30672&stc=1&d=1292428890.jpg
 

Attachments

  • ECGapp.jpg
    ECGapp.jpg
    20 KB · Views: 3,804
Last edited by a moderator:
yes i saw the circuit in the data sheet, and since the output voltage should swing between +3 and -3, so i think that the output voltage should be referenced to PIN number 5 in AD620, do you think so?
 
hisham.i said:
yes i saw the circuit in the data sheet, and since the output voltage should swing between +3 and -3, so i think that the output voltage should be referenced to PIN number 5 in AD620, do you think so?
Yes. That's the way I see it.
 
The original arduino circuit uses a single +5 volt supply with a derived mid-point (2.5v) reference at pin 5, whereas the second datasheet circuit uses a split +/-3v supply with the "ground" between the plus/minus batteries as the pin 5 reference. In both circuits the pin 4 "minus" supply is at a negative voltage with respect to pin 5...

And this may be the point of the OP's question... I would use the points labeled GND or with the little ground symbols as the output signal ground reference, something you probably can't avoid with the arduino circuit since the controller runs on the same power. In that case the arduino circuit signal will be "biased" up to 2.5v as it's virtual zero value and should swing above and below that reference, between 0v at it's most negative and 5v at it's most positive. The datasheet circuit's output will swing + and - from the 0v ground reference. If you connect that to the arduino's input you will not be able to convert any of the - swing, it would all look like 0v (if it didn't damage the input itself).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K