Is This Proof Book Worth the Investment for a Novice Mathematician?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Angry Citizen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the value of a specific mathematics book for an engineering student interested in higher mathematics. The student is contemplating an extra year of study to enhance their understanding of proofs, particularly since they lack experience with basic proof concepts. They have a solid foundation in mathematics and are preparing for advanced topics like multivariable calculus, linear algebra, and real analysis. Respondents affirm the book's quality, noting that it effectively covers foundational concepts, though it may start slowly for some readers. Emphasis is placed on the importance of engaging with the problems and mastering induction proofs. Additionally, suggestions are made to consider second-hand or older editions for better value, highlighting that the book contains well-worked solutions that can aid learning.
Angry Citizen
Messages
607
Reaction score
0
I'm curious if this book is worth the money. I'm an engineering student, but mathematics has always fascinated me, and I'm considering doing the extra year in college just to learn some higher mathematics. Trouble is, I'll have to learn how to prove things -- and as someone who's never even had the basic proofs introduced in geometry, I'm a complete novice. I've got a fairly solid background in mathematics; I'm about to start multivariable/vector calculus this spring, and I'll have all summer to work through it before I start classes like linear algebra and real analysis. Also, it'd be great to prove some of the theorems from elementary algebra and calculus, especially the ones I can never remember. Anyway, here's the book; I'd appreciate any opinions on it:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0521675995/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's as decent a book as any. Make sure to do some of the problems.
 
I have it and it is pretty good. Depending on your level, it may start off a little slowly for you. If you are wanting to skip ahead, at least skim the earlier sections to make sure you understand all the details. Sometimes there are little concepts that make a big difference later, especially in logic, proof and beginning set theory.

My recommendation - do lots and lots of induction proofs when you get to them.

The first half of this book is pretty good for the basics as well. Look for a second-hand copy or an older edition. It has well-worked solutions in the book itself.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0131679953/?tag=pfamazon01-20
(ignore the comments on amazon, I found it well-written)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
34
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Back
Top