Is Equilibrium Achievable in a Simple Pulley System?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter T@P
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of equilibrium in a simple pulley system, specifically focusing on a scenario where a person is pulling themselves up in a bucket attached to a pulley. Participants explore the mechanics of force distribution, tension in the ropes, and the implications of mechanical advantage in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that for equilibrium to be achieved, equal forces must be applied to both sides of the pulley, questioning whether the force applied by the person in the bucket matters.
  • Another participant explains that in an ideal pulley system, the tension is the same throughout the rope, suggesting that the person only needs to exert half the weight of the bucket and themselves due to the mechanical advantage provided by the pulley.
  • A participant requests clarification on the concept of mechanical advantage, indicating a lack of understanding of how it applies to the pulley system.
  • One participant simplifies the scenario by discussing a mass supported by multiple ropes, explaining that the load is shared equally among the ropes, contrasting this with a single rope scenario.
  • Another participant reiterates the mechanical advantage concept, emphasizing that if two ropes support the weight, each only needs to support half the weight, regardless of whether they are two separate ropes or the two ends of the same rope.
  • Several participants express a desire for equations related to the forces involved, indicating a conceptual understanding but seeking mathematical representation.
  • One participant raises a question about the implications of the person using their muscles in addition to their weight, suggesting that this could affect the equilibrium state.
  • A participant poses a hypothetical scenario about someone pulling the person in the bucket from the ground, questioning if this situation would be analogous to the person pulling themselves up and noting a difference in the forces required for equilibrium.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the mechanical advantage of pulleys and the forces involved in maintaining equilibrium. There is no consensus on the implications of additional forces exerted by the person or the comparison of different pulling scenarios.

Contextual Notes

Some participants seek clarification on the equations governing the forces in the system, indicating that there may be unresolved mathematical steps or assumptions regarding the ideal conditions of the pulley system.

T@P
Messages
274
Reaction score
0
Assume that a person is pulling himself up in a bucket attached to a simple pulley (no double pulleys or anything), and that it is in a state fof equilibrium. For this to be true, equal forces must be applied to both sides of the pulley. (if the person has a mass m, and the force on one side is f, then f = mg)

does it matter the force is applied by the person in the bucket or not? I have reason to believe that fromthe bucket one must pull with less force to maintain and equilibrium, but this is counter intuitive. Any thoughts on why either can be true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For an ideal pulley and massless rope the tension will be the same throughout the rope. If one end of the rope is attached to the bucket, and the person pulls on the other end, then the amount of force the person must pull with is only half the weight of the "bucket + person". Think about it: how many ropes attach to the "bucket + person"?

If there was no pulley, just a single rope hanging down, the person would have to pull with twice as much force since they would have to support the entire weight. (The pulley provides a mechanical advantage.)

Does this help?
 
can you be more precise? i don't quite understand the "mechanical advantage" of the pulley
 
Forget about the man in the bucket and even the pulley. In the first case just look at it as a single mass (a brick say) held up by two ropes. Assuming the ropes are evenly spaced about the center of gravity, each will share the load equally. If you had three ropes attached to the same mass each would carry 1/3 the load and so on. In the second case, only one rope is attached to the same mass. It doesn't matter where the other end of the rope is as long as only one rope is attached to the mass and holding it in equilibrium. Since there is only one rope attached to the mass, it must provide all of the force on its own.
 
T@P said:
can you be more precise? i don't quite understand the "mechanical advantage" of the pulley
Think of it like I and 5X5 explained. If the "person + bucket" is supported by two ropes, then each rope need only support half the weight. (Note: It doesn't matter that the "two" ropes are just the two ends of the same rope!) But if there's only one rope attached, that single rope must support the entire weight.

That arrangement of a person pulling themselves up in a bucket (or chair!) attached to a pulley is called a Bosun's chair. Check out the cartoon of "harry the painter" at the bottom of this web page for an illustration: http://www.phy.ntnu.edu.tw/java/wheelAxle/pulley.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thanks a lot for your help. I was wondering if any of you knew the equations of these forces? I understand it conceptually, but i would greatly appreciate the equations. thanks again for the wonderful site Doc Al.
 
T@P said:
I was wondering if any of you knew the equations of these forces? I understand it conceptually, but i would greatly appreciate the equations.
It's easy. Since the person is in equilibrium, the forces pulling him up (the tension in the ropes) must balance the force him down (his weight). In the case of the person pulling himself up in the bosun's chair there are two rope connections, thus: 2T = mg.
 
Thanks a lot for your advice. Everything makes sense now, thanks!
 
What if the person uses his muscles too, not only his weight?
 
  • #10
saksham said:
What if the person uses his muscles too, not only his weight?
In the person exerts a force on the rope (thus creating tension in the rope) such that 2T > mg, then he will accelerate upwards.
 
  • #11
I'm a bit confused. I understand the concept. What happens if someone is trying to pull the man in the bucket from the ground? Would that be the same as pulling him up with one rope from someone above him? I have this homework question and the force required to keep the man in equilibrium is twice that of the man in bucket trying to keep himself at equilibrium.

[edit]
heres a picture
http://img337 . imageshack.us/i/physicsyp.png/
with no spaces
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
11K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K