Mystery history of double-slit experiment with electrons

crx
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
Who did and when, the first double-slit experiment using single electrons?





(no wikipedia reference please...)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
searching "history electron double slit" on google books, I came across this book which says on p. 837:
From the 1927-8 electron crystal scattering results by Davisson (USA) and G. Thomson (UK) right up to the 1960s, classical double-slit interference of electrons remained in the "Gedankenexperiment" realm. Then Jönsson in Tübingen found a clever means to produce slit masks of unprecedented minuteness (ca 1 \mu). Figure 1 shows the result for double-slit interference of an electron beam, the first direct corroboration that the Young result still obtains.
This page says the guy's name was Claus Jönsson, and the experiment was done in 1961.
 
Found another article:

http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/grad/501/links/double_slit_experiment.pdf

Fills in more details about other experiments prior to Jönsson's which laid the groundwork, and also mentions later milestones like the first double-slit experiment where only one electron was going through the slits at a time (in 1989).
 
I was also was wondering how a single electron gun works... I was reading before about an experiment when scientists "split" an electron in liquid helium (hydrogen?) exciting it with a IR laser... They didnt say though what was the final two "entity's" electric charge...
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top