Is 0.9~ equal to 1 in mathematical calculations?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Gara
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Weird
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical equivalence of 0.9~ and 1, exploring various proofs and concepts related to repeating decimals, limits, and infinite series. Participants engage in technical reasoning, conceptual clarifications, and some debate regarding the implications of these mathematical ideas.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that 0.9~ equals 1, providing proofs involving division by 3 and limits.
  • One participant discusses the concept of limits using the analogy of moving halfway across a street, suggesting that while one may not reach the endpoint, they will not exceed it.
  • Another participant presents a series that converges to 1, arguing that 0.9~ is the limit of the series summing 9/10^n.
  • Some participants propose using the formula for repeating decimals to show that 0.9~ equals 1, with references to fractions like 9/9.
  • A participant questions the validity of treating two allegedly identical real numbers as being apart on the real number line, introducing a comparison with 0.4 and 0.33~.
  • Several participants introduce a separate question about the infinite series (1-1)+(1-1)+..., discussing its convergence and implications for the equality of 1 and 0.
  • One participant presents a manipulation of the equation x = 0.9~ to derive that x = 1, reinforcing the argument that 0.9~ equals 1.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the equivalence of 0.9~ and 1, with some providing proofs in support of the equivalence while others raise questions and challenge the reasoning. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives present.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various mathematical concepts, including limits, convergence of series, and properties of repeating decimals, but do not reach a consensus on the implications of these ideas for the equality of 0.9~ and 1.

Gara
Messages
152
Reaction score
0
Okay so most of us know 0.9~ = 1, correct?

We find this by doing 1 devided by 3. This makes 0.3~

0.3~ * 3 = 0.9~ So 0.9~ = 1. As most of us know.

But would not 0.3~ = 0.4?

Then it would be 0.4 * 3 = 1.2? So 1 / 3 * 3 = 1.2?

¬_` :confused:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Gara said:
Okay so most of us know 0.9~ = 1, correct?

We find this by doing 1 devided by 3. This makes 0.3~

0.3~ * 3 = 0.9~ So 0.9~ = 1. As most of us know.

But would not 0.3~ = 0.4?

Then it would be 0.4 * 3 = 1.2? So 1 / 3 * 3 = 1.2?

¬_` :confused:

Does 1/3 = 4? No.

You need to learn the concept of a limit.

Consider this: You move half way across the street, then half of the remining distance, and keep going half way...

Wether or not you reach the end of the street isn't certain, BUT I can tell you you will NEVER get PAST the end point of the street.

Mathematically:
1/2+1/4+1/8+1/16 ... = 1

The same applies to the infinite 3s:
3/10 + 3/100 + 3/1000 ... = .3 + .03 + .003 ... = 1/3 = .333~

Consider this proof for 1 = .999~

.9 = 1 - 10^-1
.09 = 1 - 10^-2
.999~ = 1 - 10^-infinity
x^-y = 1/(x^y)
.999~ = 1 - 10^-infinity = 1 - 1/(10^infinity) = 1 - 1/infinity = 1 - 0 = 1

There. The difference is 0.
 
Think of it this way .\overline{999} is the real number that the series \sum_{i=1}^\infty \frac{9}{10^n} converges to. That series converges to 1 (due to a few simple proofs of properties of series of real numbers).

Edit: I just remembered I wrote up a pdf on this a while back. http://s89707303.onlinehome.us/mathwork/infinity.pdf it is.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You could also use the formula for repeating decimals, I suppose. Since .\overline{2} is \frac{2}{9}, you could say .\overline{9} = \frac{9}{9}, or 1.

Cogito, shouldn't that infinite sum be this?

\sum_{i=1}^{\infty} \frac{9}{10^i}
 
Last edited:
0.4-0.33... > 0.4-0.34 = 0.06

so two allegedly identical real numbers are more than 6 hundredths apart on the real number line?
 
nolachrymose said:
You could also use the formula for repeating decimals, I suppose. Since .\overline{2} is \frac{2}{9}, you could say .\overline{9} = \frac{9}{9}, or 1.

Cogito, shouldn't that infinite sum be this?

\sum_{i=1}^{\infty} \frac{9}{10^i}
yes it should. thank you for being perceptive.
 
1/9=.1~
2/9=.2~
3/9=.3~
3/9=1/3
...
9/9=.9~
9/9=1
 
Now, where's that Math FAQ when you need it ?
 
Alkatran said:
Does 1/3 = 4? No.

You need to learn the concept of a limit.

Consider this: You move half way across the street, then half of the remining distance, and keep going half way...

Wether or not you reach the end of the street isn't certain, BUT I can tell you you will NEVER get PAST the end point of the street.


But in real life, don't we always get past the end point of the street easily??



Alkatran said:
Mathematically:
1/2+1/4+1/8+1/16 ... = 1

I have another question:
(1-1)+(1-1)+(1-1)+(1-1)...=0
We can change the above equation to~
1+(-1+1)+(-1+1)+(-1+1)...=1
Since both equatoins have infinite 1 and -1
Can we say that 1=0?
 
  • #10
Leaping antalope said:
I have another question:
(1-1)+(1-1)+(1-1)+(1-1)...=0
We can change the above equation to~
1+(-1+1)+(-1+1)+(-1+1)...=1
Since both equatoins have infinite 1 and -1
Can we say that 1=0?

OK, you went the way as Euler did.
Just look 1-1+1-1+... as a function, and it will always be changing, namely it is actually a variable. Then can you say a variable equals a constant?
....
 
  • #11
Leaping antalope said:
I have another question:
(1-1)+(1-1)+(1-1)+(1-1)...=0
We can change the above equation to~
1+(-1+1)+(-1+1)+(-1+1)...=1
Since both equatoins have infinite 1 and -1
Can we say that 1=0?
The even partial sums of this series equal 0, whereas the odd partial sums equal 1.
A necessary condition for the sum of the infinite series to EXIST, is that ALL sequences composed of partial sums must converge to the SAME NUMBER.
Since one sequence of partial sums is the sequence of even partial sums, and another sequence of partial sums is the sequence of odd partial sums, we see that this condition is not fulfilled.
Hence, we say that the infinite series is divergent (i.e, it doesn't have a sum).
 
  • #12
Leaping antalope said:
I have another question:
(1-1)+(1-1)+(1-1)+(1-1)...=0
We can change the above equation to~
1+(-1+1)+(-1+1)+(-1+1)...=1
Since both equatoins have infinite 1 and -1
Can we say that 1=0?

this is a very discrete quesiton...
 
  • #13
a bit late, but i like this one

x=0.\overline{9}

10x=9.\overline{9}

10x-x=9.\overline{9}-0.\overline{9}

9x=9

x=1

:)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K