Managed to find the humidity ratio

  • Thread starter Thread starter TSN79
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Humidity Ratio
AI Thread Summary
To determine the specific enthalpy of moist air with given conditions (760 mmHg, 80% relative humidity, and 30 degrees C), one can use a psychometric chart to find the corresponding specific enthalpy, which is 85.25 kJ/kg. The calculation involves using the equation h = h_air + ωh_water, where ω is the humidity ratio. Although the enthalpy value may not appear in standard steam tables for the specific temperature and pressure, the psychometric chart provides the necessary data. This method effectively accounts for the contributions of both dry air and water vapor in the moist air mixture. Understanding these principles is essential for accurate thermodynamic calculations in engineering applications.
TSN79
Messages
422
Reaction score
0
Moist air has these values; 760mmHg, 80%, 30 degrees C. I have managed to find the humidity ratio (21,65 g/kg), but how can I determine the specific enthalpy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TSN79 said:
Moist air has these values; 760mmHg, 80%, 30 degrees C. I have managed to find the humidity ratio (21,65 g/kg), but how can I determine the specific enthalpy?

Can you assume the water vapor is at saturation, then look up the enthalpy in a steam table for that temp/press combination?
 
No, the answer should be 85.25 kJ/kg, and this value is not in the table for this temp/pressure comb., so there must be some equation in use to figure it out...I guess.
 
Use a psychometric chart for water in air (One is presented in " Basic Principles and Calculations in Chemical Engineering" -David Himmelblau ,Fourth Edition- Prentice Hall, Inc. ) and intercept temperature ( 30 C) and relative humidity ( 80 %). Then you read the corresponding specific enthalpy 85. 25 kJ/kg.
 
What about if you prove with:

h=h_{air}+\omega h_{water}

where \omega is the humidity ratio?
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top