Force distribution to supporting points

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the resulting forces at support points of a stacked box system under a downward force, one must consider both equilibrium and non-equilibrium scenarios. In equilibrium, the sum of forces at the support points equals the applied force, but in non-equilibrium, additional calculations are necessary to account for torque and stability. The system is stable if the resultant force is within the boundaries of the support points, while instability occurs if the force extends beyond them. Understanding indirect forces is crucial, especially in complex configurations like a stair-like stack of boxes, where direct weights do not fully represent the stability. A comprehensive approach to force distribution is essential for accurate stability analysis in static physics engines.
ErikvdW
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone!
(little background: I'm trying to develop a small, quick 'n dirty static physics engine to determine whether a stacking of boxes is stable).

If I have a 3D box (with the bottom in the horizontal plane), resting on n points (at [xn, yn]), and we apply a downward force F at [xF, yF], how can I calculate the resulting forces Fn at these n points?

If the system is in equilibrium then \SigmaFn = F.
However, I must also consider that the system might not be in equilibrium (for instance, if all xn < xF), so I can't use equilibrium equations. I'd still like to know the forces in that case, though, so that I can calculate the resulting torque.

Is there an easy formula for this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Seems to me the system will be stable if there is no moment force. So the stacking will be stable when the resultant downward force is between the support points...and unstable if the force is outside any of the support points.
 
Thanks for the reply, but I'm really more interested in the resulting forces than just a stable/not stable decision. For instance, a stair-like stack of three boxes might have the direct weights of each of the boxes between their contact points but might still be unstable because of indirect forces. Which means I need to be able to determine these indirect forces.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top