Can Autocorrelation Affect Exponential Smoothing Results?

  • Thread starter Thread starter neznam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponential
AI Thread Summary
Autocorrelation in time series can significantly influence the choice of the smoothing parameter, lambda, in exponential smoothing methods. If the time series shows little to no autocorrelation, a low lambda value is recommended, indicating that past observations have less influence on future forecasts. Conversely, if autocorrelation is present, a higher lambda value should be used, making forecasts more reliant on recent observations. The selection of lambda ultimately involves personal judgment by the statistician, as there is no strict expectation for its value. Understanding this relationship is crucial for accurate forecasting in time series analysis.
neznam
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I have a conceptual question. Looking at exponential smoothing methods I came across relationship between the autocorrelation function and lambda. It says that if the time series doesn't apper to be autocorrelated then lambda is expected to have a low value :confused: .Any help will be appreciated.

1st order exponential smoothing
y(t)tilda=λ*y(t)+(1-λ)*y(t-1)tilda
where λ=1-θ
and θ represents the weights
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, in many statistical tests, inferences or applications, personal judgement is required. I would rephrase your statement to "If the time series appears to not be auto-correlated, we should set lambda to a low value." After all, choosing lambda is a personal judgement on the part of the statistician, there is no "expectation of lambda" here.

so:

forecast(t)= lambda*observation(t-1) + (1-lambda)*forecast(t-1)

So if the time series appears correlated, then lambda should be set to a high value. Thereafter, forecast(t) will depend highly on observation(t-1) and less on forecast(t-1).
 
Thanks a lot. That makes a lot of sense now :-)
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...
Back
Top