Statics - It seems simple, but there must be a catch

  • Thread starter Thread starter Femme_physics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a statics problem involving a structure made of two weightless parts connected by joints, with a moment of 50 Nm acting at point C. The participant initially calculated the support forces at A, B, and C but realized they overlooked the moment of Bx, which is crucial due to the angle involved. They are preparing for multiple upcoming exams and are dedicated to mastering the material, having studied for 16 hours straight. The participant expresses a desire to excel in their studies, particularly in a male-dominated field, and appreciates the support from the forum community. The conversation highlights the challenges and determination involved in mastering statics concepts.
Femme_physics
Gold Member
Messages
2,548
Reaction score
1
Statics - It seems simple, but there must be a catch...

(Sorry if I'm overasking for one day. Clearly I'm doing a marathon of statics exercises today and you're all super helpful ^^)

Homework Statement



This structure is made out of 2 weightless parts, BCD and AC, connected by joints. At C is acting a pair of forces, their moment is
m = 50 [Nm]

Calculate the support forces at A, B, and C

The measurements are in mm



The Attempt at a Solution


Attached. The answers for Rb, Ra, and Rc are 390.60 [N]

Not sure what I'm doing wrong..?
 

Attachments

  • needhelp.jpg
    needhelp.jpg
    23.3 KB · Views: 374
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Do you have a statics exam coming up or something?

You forgot the moment of Bx.
 


Not forgot, rather didn't know it exist! But, that's right --that tiny angle there counts for length! *smacks forehead* I'll redo it right now.

Do you have a statics exam coming up or something?

More like 3! Two internal and one big end-year external one coming up the following weeks, and months. Time for the one girl to prove her mettle against the boys club :D
Actually we were given a notebook with a questions and last semester I got some praises for finishing the entire notebook (which had A LOT of questions). I did get a lot of help from this forum, esp. tiny-tim. I was thinking to do the same with this notebook. We actually got a solution manual this semester, but I sometimes want to fully fathom the question and try other methods to solve it. I'm a mechanics explorer ^^

I'm a bit obsessed though, I admit, I've been now self-studying for 16 hours straight and got some coffee next to me as I'm insistent on not going to bed rather solve more problems...picturial proof attached lol! (and yes, in case you're wondering, I did spill that coffee 1 minute after the shot heh)

Thanks a lot for all your help Serena!
 

Attachments

  • picpove.JPG
    picpove.JPG
    25.8 KB · Views: 466


Femme_physics said:
More like 3! Two internal and one big end-year external one coming up the following weeks, and months. Time for the one girl to prove her mettle against the boys club :D

So are you aiming for top-of-the-class? That'll show them!

Femme_physics said:
I'm a mechanics explorer ^^

That's great! :smile:
I hope to see some more exploring!

Femme_physics said:
I'm a bit obsessed though, I admit, I've been now self-studying for 16 hours straight and got some coffee next to me as I'm insistent on not going to bed rather solve more problems...picturial proof attached lol! (and yes, in case you're wondering, I did spill that coffee 1 minute after the shot heh)

Thanks a lot for all your help Serena!

LOL! And I appreciate you took the time to take the pic!
 


That's the least I can do :) You'll definitely be seeing more exploring, no worries there :D

Yes, I am aiming for the top of the class! What a hoot will it be if the best student in mechanical engineering is a gurl? :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top