Polynomial Equation-Application

  • Thread starter Thread starter notsosmartman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomial
AI Thread Summary
To solve the problem of finding the radii of four ball bearings where the largest radius equals the combined volume of the other three, define the largest radius as "x." The radii of the smaller spheres differ by 1mm, leading to the equation that relates their volumes: (4/3)π((x-1)³ + (x-2)³ + (x-3)³) = (4/3)πx³. This simplifies to the polynomial equation x³ - 9x² + 21x - 18 = 0. Various methods can be employed to solve this cubic equation for the value of x.
notsosmartman
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
First of all this is from a book I own. It is not for any class or assignment. I am just curios on how you would go about solving such a problem.

The radii of four different-sized ball bearings differ by 1.0mm in radius from one size to the next. If the volume of the largest equals of the other three combined, find the radii.

Any help is greatly appreciated!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, the first thing to do when approaching these problems is to define an attribute as your variable and this is the part which many people find the most difficult. For this question, it might make sense to call the radius of the largest sphere "x".

Now we know that the radii differ by 1mm for each successive sphere, and we also know that the volume of the smaller three sum up to the larger sphere.

Therefore we know that

\frac{4}{3}\pi((x-1)^{3} + (x-2)^{3} + (x-3)^{3}) = \frac{4}{3}\pi x^{3}

which we can simplify into

x^{3} - 9x^{2} + 21x - 18 = 0

now there are numerous ways to solve this equation which I will not go into.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top