Dear allI work with a spectrophotometer

  • Thread starter Thread starter atish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
atish
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
dear all
I work with a spectrophotometer "Carry 17D". below 300nm wavelenght the transition spectrom have lots of flactuation. how to solve the problem and how to provide a clear spectrom?
regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Often spectrometers will compute a baseline and then normalise spectra to that baseline. If the signal to noise ratio drops at shorter wavelengths, then normalised spectra will become progressively noisier at the shorter wavelengths.

To resolve this, you need either a brighter source, a better detector, or optics/gratings that have lower losses below 300 nm.

Measuring lots of spectra and averaging them can also reduce the noise, but this approach is time-consuming.

Claude.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top